Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

Today's Huffery:  The Greatest Screenplay Never Made

1/16/2013

26 Comments

 
Not long ago at a Writers Guild of America event, a reporter friend came up to me. "I'm doing an article on the best screenplays that have never been made into movies," he said. "If you had to name one, what would it be?"

Without hesitating, I answered, Harrow Alley.

He scrunched his face. "I've never heard of it." And started to walk off. Just then, another screenwriter passed by, one with gravitas (and awards) to his name, a former president of the Guild. The reporter asked the same question.

Without hesitating, the gravitas writer answered, "Harrow Alley."

Now, the reporter took out his notepad. "Oh, I see," I chided. "Him you believe."

Every once in a while, some publication does an article like this. The Los Angeles Times once referred to Harrow Alley as perhaps the finest unproduced movie script ever. The Writers Guild Newsletter described it as, "A masterpiece...The most famous unproduced script in the country." In 1991, American Film magazine called Harrow Alley one of the best screenplays ever written. In July, 1999, Premieremagazine referred to it as "Arguably one of the most famous unproduced scripts of all time."

Harrow Alley is a stunning screenplay. Brilliantly crafted, dramatic, funny, heartbreaking, romantic and inspiring. It was written in the early 1960s by Walter Brown Newman, one of the great, unknown screenwriters. (Of course, most screenwriters are unknown, foolishly.) Newman's many credentials, however, include such classics as The Great Escape, The Magnificent Seven and Cat Ballou. So, you see, it's got a pretty good pedigree. (Newman took his name off of The Great Escape. He was a crusty sort.)

So, why in the world has it never been made, I hear you cry?? Ah, therein lies a tale. And further tales.

Harrow Alley tells a hard story. It takes place during the Black Plague of the 14th century. The screenplay intricately weaves a breathtaking saga of how, during the worst time in the history of mankind, when the world was literally dying and no one knew how to stop it, or if it could be stopped, man will kick and fight and scratch and struggle to survive because man has a will to survive. At its center of many riveting characters are two totally opposite men, vibrant personalities whose lives intertwine and then set-off in utterly surprising ways.

When it was written, 50 years ago, most people were scared by the script, missing its rich optimism, and seeing only the rampant death, with the death-knell bell ringing unrelentingly throughout the story whenever yet another person died. It was an uncomfortable script for people to read back in 1960s, in the midst of hippies, the peace movement, drugs and the Love Generation, in the midst of Vietnam. People didn't want to deal with a movie about a plague wiping out mankind.

In William Froug's great book, The Screenwriter Looks at the Screenwriter, Newman says that one studio story editor told him, "What the hell made you write this? Boy, I read it on a rainy Sunday and damn near committed suicide." The wife of a studio head sent an incensed note to Newman, telling him he was crazy.

The thing is, for all the horror of the Plague, the script is actually intensely hopeful and uplifting. It's filled with a glorious love story, a stunning act of heroism, humor, and characters who find profound personal depth. As Newman notes, "I was simply writing about how do we live under such conditions." And after looking at it years later, "I was glad to see, in rereading, that I was saying such a great big yes to living because I had no idea I felt that way."

Finally, a legendary director was anxious to make the film -- John Huston, whose many classics included The Maltese Falcon and The African Queen. Unfortunately, at the time he'd had a series of flops and couldn't get financing.

Next, a variety of top actors got interested. Among them, Charlton Heston. Even Peter Sellers was interested. The Royal Shakespeare Company inquired about adapting it for the stage. But nothing came of it.

And then George C. Scott enters the story.

The acclaimed actor loved Harrow Alley so much that he bought it outright. Several years passed, however, until he announced he wanted to make it. And therein lies another tale.

He wanted to direct. Scott was highly admired as an actor (soon to win his Oscar for Patton). But he hadn't yet directed a movie. And so studios were hesitant -- and again the project languished for years. Eventually, Scott was willing to let someone else direct and himself produce it. And yet another tale.

To his credit, George C. Scott adored Harrow Alley so much that he insisted not one word be changed. This is unheard of in Hollywood, and monumentally admirable. But even there, that turned into another major problem: the screenplay is very long, equal to a three-hour movie. It never lags, and remains riveting... but it's still three hours. Moreover, before they get involved, most directors want their imprint and insist on changing screenplays. (Not always for the better, of course.) But Scott would always say, "No." Not one word could be changed. Even when Walter Newman himself offered to trim his own script, in an effort to finally move the project along, Scott refused. And so Harrow Alley languished even more.

Eventually, George C. Scott passed away, but people remain interested in making Harrow Alley" However, in Scott's will, there's still a condition that the script cannot be changed, and that's served to be yet another hurdle, though not necessarily an insurmountable one. In fact, new producers got involved not long ago.

And so, though Harrow Alley is still the greatest screenplay never made, there is hope that will change. After all, what terrified people 35 years ago, is commonplace today. The world deals with the plague of AIDS daily. Nuclear devastation is an ever-present threat. We live with the threat of terrorism. Furthermore, there have even now been popular movies about worldwide plagues, like Outbreak ($190 million) and Contagion ($135 million) that prove the world will flock to such stories.

To be sure, Harrow Alley has an uncomfortable theme. But to be sure, as well, it has an enthralling optimism about mankind's will to live, lyrical majesty and vibrant characters -- and two, truly epic lead roles -- that soar like you can't believe. And audiences are long-since ready for it now.

The only remaining question is if a studio is ready to step up and finally make Harrow Alley.


UPDATE – 3/10/2026
 
For reasons too long to get into, I came upon this article which I’d written over a dozen years earlier, and realized there were a few things that should be added.  One, about that status of Harrow Alley in the intervening years, and the other – material that for the life of me I don’t know why I didn’t include in the original article.  So, we'll address all of that.
 
The current status is that whoever owns the rights to the movie at the moment – and it’s been hard to track down, though it might still be the George C. Scott estate…or not – Emma Thompson has been attached since around 2007 when she was hired to write a revision.  (Around that time, the producer involved was Lindsay Doran, who had made such films as Sense and Sensibility, The Firm and Nanny McPhee.  I haven’t seen that she’s still involved, however, so it strikes me as unlikely.)  As of 2023, though, Emma Thompson was still with the film and working with a British production company, Bad Wolf, perhaps to develop it for TV.  It’s unclear if it would be as a single movie or multi-part limited series…which would be encouraging since, given the original script’s length and effort over the years to trim it, a limited series would allow as much of the original material to be done as possible.  Bad Wolf was founded in 2015 by former BBC executives Julie Gardner and Jane Tranter.  In 2021, a majority interest in the company was bought by Sony Pictures TV. 
 
I came across a very promising quote from Emma Thompson on the project – not promising because of any information about it being made, but about her screenplay revision.  The original screenplay by Walter Brown Newman is so superb I’ve been wary about any efforts to rework it for current sensibilities.  And while her quote supports my wariness, the full quote adds an encouraging twist.  She said that the revision of hers that she did initially is not what it would be all these years later.  “His is the great work — my revisions are neither here nor there,” she told Scott Foster on his Moviemaker website.  “I must tell you that the version of mine which perhaps you found online is one that was produced many years ago for a company that wanted a happy ending, amongst other not entirely suitable things.”  She added that although that 2007 revision she wrote was reverent to Newman’s version, Foster wrote that “the producers asked  her to make a few dramatic changes to fill in his most cryptic 30 pages with explanatory light. They injected plot in the gaps where Newman wanted none.”  So, it would seem that if and when Harrow Alley does get made – with Emma Thompson’s involvement – those less than reverent changes she was required to make will be gone, and the script will be close to Walter Brown Newman’s “great work.”
 
As for what I left out of the original article  --
 
-- that’s my own, very-limited involvement trying to get the movie made.  I was working at Universal Pictures in the mid-1980s, I worked at Universal Pictures in development, as an assistant to Bob Rehme who was the president of the studio.  One day, I decided to pitch Harrow Alley to him – but knew if I was was too upfront about what the project was, it would likely scare him off.  So, I first brought up that I’d come across a brilliant screenplay, and that it had long been considered in several articles and polls the greatest screenplay that had never yet been made into a movie, and that it was written by one of Hollywood’s great screenwriters who written movies such as The Great Escape, The Magnificent Seven and Cat Ballou -- and that though initially it was a challenging topic, it wasn’t anymore, and would make a tremendous movie.  Bob was very excited at this point, and anxiously asked me what the project was.  I said it was called Harrow Alley, and – at this point, I had no choice but to dive in, hoping that I’d set things up well enough – it was about the Black Plague in 1665 and…  Well, there was nothing else needed to say, since his face dropped, his body shrank, and it was like all the air had been sucked out of the room.
 
About 10 years later, I made another stab at getting Harrow Alley set up, though it was a far longer shot.  With my friend Philippa Salisbury, we got a talented Hollywood financial expert to join us, and he budgeted the movie for workable cost.  I had a copy of the budget for years – it was over 300 pages.  After many years, there was no reason to keep it – but I did keep what is now one of my prize possessions (and I have absolutely no recollection how I came across it):  a detailed blueprint for the London neighborhood of Harrow Alley that had been drawn for a prospective production of the movie – what year, I don’t know – designed and signed by Elliott Scott, the legendary art director and production designer whose credits include Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Dragonslayer, Evil Under the Sun, Labyrinth, The Pirates of Penzance, The Yellow Rolls-Royce and three Oscar nominations, among them one for Who Framed Roger Rabbit? We also came up with a semi-clever way to deal with long-standing studio concern of a 177-page screenplay:  we retyped the script using a proportional Times-New Roman font that’s uses less space than the stand Courier.  Our version came in at just 138 pages!  (We knew it wouldn’t ultimately fool anyone, since they’d easily recognize the different font, but our hope was that the shorter length wouldn’t scare anyone off even before they read a word.)  Alas, it was for naught.  But we tried.  And I’ve kept trying, if only to keep the name of Harrow Alley alive.
 
And so, still, the only remaining question is if a studio is ready to step up and finally make Harrow Alley.

26 Comments
Shelly Goldstein
1/16/2013 05:34:08 am

Great article. I'd never heard of the script.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
1/16/2013 05:57:43 am

It's the kind of screenplay one reads in awe. The scope, the sweep of language, the humor, the tragedy and romance, the despair and profound hope. But mainly, it's just freaking rich as literature. What I left out of the article is that I'm aware of a respectable producer who got the rights and has been trying to get it made the last few years. What the issue is still getting in the way, I have no idea, but hope springs eternal.

Reply
rick burke link
6/9/2015 04:38:51 am

Can you send me harrow alley pdf thanks

Robert Elisberg
6/9/2015 05:00:17 am

Rick, thanks for your note. Unfortunately, I don't have a PDF file of the script to send. Hopefully one of the other people you asked will have one.

buzz link
1/16/2013 07:15:08 am

I read it years ago (late 70s/early 80s). It has not been over hyped. Hopefully somebody will produce it as it should be done; otherwise when copyright runs out sometime next century it'll be on the 22nd century equivalent of YouTube in the 22nd century equivalent of Legos...

Reply
Robert Elisberg
1/16/2013 07:23:03 am

Good point. You've just given me a good reason to stick around until the next century.

As if I really needed one...

Reply
Josh Newman
2/15/2013 07:19:51 am

A very small correction, for what it's worth ... Harrow Alley was written over a couple of years in the early 1960s, not in 1970. I think George C. Scott finally was able to buy it around 1970, and maybe that's the source of the confusion.

I have an insider's view, because Walter Newman was my father -- although offsetting that, I was young enough that I wasn't paying much attention for this whole period of time.

In the Bill Froug interview you mentioned, my father said that he'd written the screenplay in six weeks or so. It's certainly possible that he wrote his final draft in six weeks -- but in fact from start to finish the screenplay took him something like two years. He wasn't working on anything else, and so wasn't drawing a paycheck. From talking with my mother many years later about this, I think that was a very hard time for my folks financially, and I imagine his speaking of it in the interview (which was also much later on) as a six-week commitment served to gloss over some of the hardships. Or maybe it just made him happier to remember it that way.

I believe George C. Scott's estate sold the screenplay several years ago (although I'm not completely sure of its current ownership), and his determination to keep it as it was originally written may not have been part of the deal; I heard that it was being rewritten. (This was several years ago as well, and I haven't heard anything about it since. I'd love to see it made, of course.

I'm glad to know that it made so strong an impression on you. It certainly did on me.


Kind regards,
-- Josh Newman

Reply
Jodene Goldenring Fine
11/23/2014 03:32:14 am

I'm coming late to this discussion, but I cannot refrain from commenting that Harrow Alley is among the best works that ever I have read. I still have a copy, I believe, quite kindly given to me by Josh, author of the post to which I am responding. I have lovingly carted the screenplay across the country from California, to Wyoming, to Texas, to Michigan. It is among my most valued possessions. Jodene

Reply
Robert Elisberg
11/23/2014 04:06:03 am

Jodene, thanks for your note. Clearly I agree how wonderful the screenplay is. As for coming late to the discussion -- I guess that's some of the "charm" of discussing "Harrow Alley." Everyone is coming to the discussion far too late...

rick burke link
6/9/2015 04:41:08 am

Josh can you send me harrow alley pdf: l cant find it : thanks at [email protected]

Reply
Robert Elisberg
2/15/2013 04:10:59 pm

Josh,

Thanks so much for your comments and filling in some of the holes about your father's screenplay. I've fixed the one error you commented on about the date it was written.

As far as my own experience goes, "Harrow Alley" has made a strong impression on *most* people who have read it. Unfortunately, the people who have the ability say, "Yes, let's make it," haven't had the sense to do so -- yet. But for a screenplay to carry on its life for 50 years speaks volumes of its quality, and the realistic hope that at some point it will get made.

Reply
Outlook setting link
7/10/2013 04:36:11 pm

Thank you for writing about Writers Guild of America event and the article that you wrote about this topic gives me more about it. The screen play is very interesting to read and the words of Harrow Alley is very nice.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
7/10/2013 11:55:12 pm

You're most welcome.

Reply
Curious Filmlover
3/10/2014 04:25:50 am

Are you aware of any opportunity for non-insiders to read Harrow Alley...? I can't find any record of it being pushed, but perhaps it's appeared on a journal of some kind...?

Reply
Robert Elisberg
3/10/2014 05:45:10 am

Dear "Curious" -- Thanks for your note, but alas not. I don't know of any place it exists. My only suggestion is that some film schools might have it. UCLA has a particularly strong film library, but they might not be convenient for you. The Motion Picture Academy Library does, too, but it's hard to get access to that, though not impossible.

Reply
Kevan R. Craft
10/8/2014 11:28:41 am

I have a copy as a scanned PDF.. Emma Thompson the actress and producer currently owns the rights to Harrow Alley and she has rewritten the script and I have her draft of the script also in PDF format..

If Mr. Elsberg contacts me I will gladly make both available.. I have been contacted by Mr Newman's nephew about the script and I did send him a copy a few years ago..

BTW, if I had the opportunity of making Harrow Alley into a movie I wouldn't change a word on the page either, its one of the best screenplays I've ever read next to Touch Of Evil by Orson Welles and the unproduced script The Ends Of The Earth by Chris Terrio..

Reply
rick burke link
6/9/2015 04:43:46 am

Kevan can you send me harrow alley pdf for my freat curiosity thanks rick

Reply
Robert Elisberg
10/9/2014 12:45:48 am

Kevan, thanks for your note. I'd heard that Emma Thompson was involved, though wasn't aware that she actually had the rights. I'm glad you've been in touch with the Newman family. His son Josh, as you no doubt have seen here, has corresponded with this site. "Rewriting" is a tricky word -- it can mean trimming down the length, but keeping the original work largely in tact -- or it mean adding characters and plot points, rearranging everything. Walter Newman himself wrote a trimmed-down version which he offered to George C. Scott to help move the project along, but Scott turned it down. I suspect that version would have been solid. I'm hopeful her changes have been trimming, though I'm also curious how she got past my understanding that Scott's will doesn't permit changes. It that *is* the case. I'm interested in what's been changed, but haven't decided yet if I have it in me to read such a thing...

Reply
William Moldestad Jr
3/10/2026 10:59:09 am

Coming to this late, but the conversation here's been a fun read — especially Josh Newman's comments and Kevan Craft's mention of the Emma Thompson draft.

I'm curious whether anyone who has read Thompson's revision could speak to what she actually changed. "Rewrite" can mean anything from trimming action blocks to restructuring entire acts, and as Mr. Elisberg noted back in 2014, there's a big difference. Did she keep the Death clock ending? Did she solve the length problem by cutting subplots (Merlin and Azazel seem like obvious candidates) or by compressing scenes throughout? And did she navigate the Scott will clause, or write the revision on the assumption that it could be resolved later?

I ask because Newman's script has a handful of structural decisions that feel like they belong to the 1960s — the theatrical staging, the extended dialogue passages, characters introduced solely for exposition — but also moments of such pure cinematic power that any adapter would need real discipline to know what to touch and what to leave alone. Thompson is one of the few people I'd trust with that judgment.

If anyone here has access to her draft or can speak to the nature of the changes, I'd be genuinely grateful to hear about it.

Reply
Kevan Craft
3/10/2026 11:52:49 am

Here's the screenplay (original and Emma Thompson's revised)

Click on the link to download

Harrow Alley.zip
https://mega.nz/file/qAskzYiL#U5LcwgxZvKNj5vhPgqRuj5-UWSdPaKjB9udGeabAosU

Harrow Alley.txt
https://mega.nz/file/LYtmkBgI#JBXFyZoPr1ITuuVxcy2uTfZO-UAyo96HU5Uv0AVvdsk

Reply
Robert Elisberg
3/10/2026 05:29:25 pm

Kevan, thanks very much for uploading this. That's very thoughtful.

I know you made the offer years ago. And I had the sense that I might not have taken you up on that at the time -- but when I checked my files, the scripts are there, so apparently I did.

The reason I thought I might not have done so was, as much as I have curiosity about the Thompson draft, I'm very content with what Walter Brown Newman wrote. (And from what you wrote when you last posted here, you seem to agree, I think.)

All that said, I do dearly hope even the shorter version gets made, because that will bring the original to the light of day, where it belongs. And who knows, it might even get some people to seek out the original and read it in all its brilliance. Thanks again.

By the way, I came up some additional information about Emma Thompson's draft with I added to this article here as an "Update" at the end, but I'll also be positing it as a standalone piece soon.

Robert Elisberg
3/10/2026 03:00:05 pm

Mr. Moldestad,

Thanks for your thoughtful note. Though I can't answer your questions, it was certainly terrific of Kevan Craft diving in.

My assumption has always been that the rewrite was *mostly* a case of trimming subplot. But here's the draft to answer the question.

Personally, I'm sorry that anything substantive was undertaken. Although Walter Brown Newman did, early on, make an offer to shorten his screenplay (which George C. Scott refused to allow, after buying the rights) -- and there *might* have been good changes from that -- I'm sorry the masterpiece wasn't left as it was. For a long while, I sort of understand the desire to trim it because the length of movies generally generally had a shorter length than today. But starting about five years ago, movies have begun getting longer, with even 3-1/2 hour movies not uncommon. I suspect that's because theatrically, movie house owners wanted to get as many screenings a day as they could -- whereas now, with streaming, that's not the same consideration.

Honestly, there are other screenwriters I'd trust first with rewriting "Harrow Hallow" before Emma Thompson. But she's a good writer, and I hope she mostly left Newman work and intent, and not imposing herself. I *suspect* that's the case, but...we'll we'll find out.

Reply
Bill Moldestad
3/24/2026 07:52:53 pm

Kevan, and Mr. Elisberg,

Thank you again for sharing the Thompson draft.

I read her revision against Newman's original. At 143 pages, it's conservative in structure. Merlin and Azazel are still there. Sir Edward Alston is still there. Ring a Roses, Ratsey's farewell speech, Dan's subplot, the Baines scene — all kept. She mostly left Newman's architecture intact, which tracks with what she told Scott Foster: "His is the great work — my revisions are neither here nor there."

Where the draft does diverge from Newman, her own comments help explain why. The ending is the most notable departure. Newman's original ends with Harry delivered to Newgate, the "Life is a bloody wonder" / "Not particularly" exchange, and the Death clock inscription — "DEATH TWEAKS US BY THE EAR AND SAYS 'LIVE — I AM COMING.'" Thompson's version replaces all of that with Harry riding back to Jem on a hillside — a reconciliation. Given her comment that the draft was written for a company that "wanted a happy ending, amongst other not entirely suitable things," it seems likely this wasn't her own instinct, though she doesn't say so directly. Similarly, Foster notes that producers "asked her to make a few dramatic changes to fill in his most cryptic 30 pages with explanatory light. They injected plot in the gaps where Newman wanted none." So the version that circulated appears to reflect compromises she was asked to make, not necessarily her actual judgment about the material.

The Gaudeamus is gone from her draft, though Hodges still sings and topples into the pit. A burier kicks the body out of sight while field-birds screech and settle back to eating — a strong, cold image that feels like Thompson's own hand rather than a note from above. Morrell's stutter is removed, the Mute is cut, the ghost story is gone. These feel like legitimate trims for length.

On the whole, I think Thompson understood Newman deeply — probably better than anyone who's touched the material since Scott. If Bad Wolf moves forward and she gets to write the version she actually wants, without the happy ending and the explanatory light, it could be remarkable.

On a separate note: I've been working on my own editorial adaptation of Newman's screenplay — an 85-page version in modern format that I'll be releasing soon as a freely available document. No IP claimed, no rights asserted. It carries a disclaimer on the title page crediting Newman as the sole author and acknowledging all underlying rights belong to the relevant estates and licensees. I did it as a passion project, the same impulse that drove you to pitch it to Bob Rehme and budget it out with Philippa Salisbury. Some scripts just get under your skin.

I'll say this about why I think a shorter, more aggressive adaptation has a realistic shot at production today — and why Newman's original, much as I love it, faces the same wall it always has.

Newman wrote a 177-page masterpiece for an era when a screenplay could be literary. It could take its time. It could introduce characters for a single scene of exposition. It could let subplots unspool for thirty pages. The writing is so good that none of this feels like fat when you're reading it. But reading and producing are different problems. Every producer who's picked up Harrow Alley since 1968 has hit the same wall: it's three hours of plague, death, and moral collapse with no stars attached and no obvious marketing hook. The script's reputation keeps people picking it up. The script's length and darkness keep people setting it back down. That cycle has repeated for nearly sixty years.

An 85-page version changes the math. It's a producible two-hour film. The subplot cuts — Merlin and Azazel, the extended Fielding liturgy, Sir Edward Alston's separate scene — don't lose anything structurally essential. They just clear the path so the dual arc between Harry and Ratsey hits with the velocity a modern audience expects. The core is all there: the staircase quarantine, the nightingale scene, the bells shifting meaning, Blanche, Dickie, the fires extinguished by rain, Hodges walking into the pit, and Newman's ending — the Death clock. That ending stayed. It's the thesis of the entire work and any version that cuts it has missed the point.

What the shorter version also does is make the material accessible to the mid-budget production space where films actually get greenlit today. A two-hour period drama with two strong male leads, a confined setting, and a story that resonates with anyone who lived through 2020 — that's a film that can find financing. A three-hour one with forty speaking parts and a quack-doctor subplot is a film that people admire in PDF form and pass on in conference rooms. Newman deserved better than sixty years of admiration. The script deserves to be on a screen.

If you'd like to see the adaptation when it's ready, I'm happy to share it. And regardless, thank you fo

Reply
Robert Elisberg
3/24/2026 08:52:28 pm

Mr. Moldestad,

Thank you for your note. I have every certainty that if Bad Wolf is able to go forward with the project and with Emma Thompson's involvement, it will be with her getting rid of what she was required to and putting things back to her intent. Her focus, understanding and protection of Walter Newman's original is deeply impressive.

When I tried to get the film made with Philippa, it was from a pure admiration of the full, rich, detailed work that Walter Newman wrote and to hopefully correct a "wrong" -- seeing such a great piece of art produced. And as close to "as is" as possible. (I'd even now prefer to see his original be what's produced -- though from all I know of Emma Thompson's perspective on it all, she's kept it as near to that as reasonable. Even Newman himself offered to make trims at one point, which George C. Scott -- who then owned the rights -- refused. And in the end, it is overwhelmingly better to have such a "close to the original intent" production made, hopefully, than have none at all.)

Your own deep affection and thoughts on the original are palpable. So, again, thank you for your note.

Without remotely changing my views on that, I will be honest, and say that -- as a screenwriter and WGA member -- cutting someone else's script is not something I inherently look to as a starting point, but it's something you're doing that's important purely to yourself and included all proper credentials up front. So, I hope it brought you even closer to the original. Again, as I said, your affection for Walter Newman's work and deep appreciation of it are clear. And speaks well for how it impacted you.

Reply
Bill Moldestad
4/5/2026 04:49:22 pm

Mr. Elisberg,

A follow-up to my earlier comment, because honesty requires it.

I came in here talking about an 85-page version like I'd solved the problem everyone else had missed for sixty years... I hadn't. I'd read the script many times by then and thought I understood what could go. My framework was wrong — I was looking at it as a structure problem, thinking the dialogue could be tightened the way you'd tighten a Cameron picture, or drawn out into the kind of spare, image-driven staging Ridley Scott does. Reduce it to its action line. Let the visuals carry the weight. Get it under two hours. (I'm embarrassed.)

That doesn't work with this material. Newman's language isn't decoration on top of the story — it IS the story. The events he's depicting are so horrifying that only his voice makes them tolerable. Strip the dialogue to its plot function and you're left with two hours of death. Keep Newman's words and you have something that's somehow funny, romantic, and devastating all at once. The Merlin scene, the Sailor testing the Mute with Dutch, Alston packing his scent-box — every time I cut something for efficiency, a wall downstream cracked. So the script grew. It's now around 153 pages. The dialogue is substantially Newman's, verbatim. The structure is his. The ending is his, including the Death clock.

And for what it's worth — retyping the script in Times New Roman to get it to 138 pages is exactly the kind of move that tells me you understand this material the same way I do. You weren't trying to change it. You were trying to get someone to read it long enough to see what's there.

One more thing. In 2013, when you first wrote this article, you made the case that the world was ready for Harrow Alley because we'd lived through AIDS, terrorism, nuclear threat. You were right, but the argument is *ten times stronger now.* Everyone on earth lived through 2020. Everyone knows what it means to watch institutions fail, to see neighbors turn on each other, to watch the people in charge flee while the people who stay behind hold things together with their hands. Newman wrote all of that in 1962. The production potential and the audience for this material are substantial — not despite the darkness, but because of it. The world doesn't need to be convinced that plagues make compelling stories anymore. It lived one.

If you're interested, I'm happy to email you the script. I'm also posting it to SimplyScripts under the title *Harrow Alley* — where, sixty years on, maybe it finally finds the right pair of eyes.

Life is a bloody wonder.

Very Respectfully, Bill Moldestad

Reply
Robert Elisberg
4/5/2026 06:34:08 pm

Mr. Moldestad, thanks for the note. (And the "I'm embarrassed.")

Yes, when we changed the font, it was specifically and solely to get people to read Walter Newman's script, and not avoid it because they were terrified by the length.

And yes, too, in the more recent years, I've added in my comments to people about "Harrow Alley" that after living through COVID, the story is not only not "scary" anymore to people, but utterly understandable.

I do think/hope that today, with the people who are involved, it does have its best chance in many decades (if ever) to not only get made, but (even better) have a life as a limited series where Walter Newman's original work can be used as close as possible.

Thanks on the offer, but I'll pass on reading the script.

RJE




Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2026
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like