Today's Jon Stewart's podcast is, as they put it, “A Nuanced Conversation About COVID Vaccines (Yes, Really!)" As Jon says, “We’re back and we’re coming in hot with a conversation about COVID vaccines! We’re joined by Dr. Gregory A. Poland (Director of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group), Dr. Saad Omer (Director of the Yale Institute for Global Health), and Zeynep Tufekci (Professor at Columbia University) who bring something that’s often lacking from these conversations: nuance. We talk through why many non-crazy people are hesitant to get vaccinated, how our public health institutions have failed to communicate effectively with the masses, and why it should be perfectly okay to ask questions about the risks and benefits of any vaccine.“
Happily, although a podcast, the show now seems to be posting an audio Zoom version of the episode, so that's what we'll go with. And you can watch it here.
I think that after today's latest GOP meltdown, it would be right and proper to have a really good dog story. It's not an Adorable Animal Video (though that's a notable part of the story), but something richer.
This is a fun, fascinating report from 60 Minutes in 2014 about the first serious studies of dogs’ brains. Among other things, the studies tried to answer the age-old question: does your dog really love you? Or is it just scamming you because it knows it will get food? But they go a lot farther. Starting with a look at the border collie named Chaser.
Back in 2013, I posted an article about a science study that looked at the difference in brain activity between liberals and conservatives. I went into detail about it -- but then added that it reminded me of a similar study done two years earlier, though under more strange and fascinating circumstances.
It occurred when actor Colin Firth was invited by the BBC radio to be "guest editor" of their Today programme. I wrote at the time, "What began as a playful suggestion remarkably turned in a well-regarded study published in Current Biology on which Firth himself is listed as a co-author. It's titled "Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults." I also ended the piece with one of my favorite quotes where Firth explains what prompted him to commission the study. But I won't give it away here, I'll leave it to its rightful place at the end.
The point of this all is that, amid all the news the past few years where it seems that the core base of the Republican Party has gone...well, to be polite I'll say, "inexplicable" -- from considering Trump a demi-god, to following a literally anonymous conspiracy site, to thinking the dead son of President Kennedy will come back to life and run with Trump, to truly believing the 2016 election was stolen, despite losing 60 lawsuits and zero evidence that's admissible in court, to nominating a candidate to be on the town council despite him killing his wife with cancer, throwing her off a bridge, admitting to his actions and being in jail and more and more and more -- it seemed a good time to bring back that article on the two studies.
If I Only Had a Brain
February 20, 2013
A new study shows that there actually is a difference in the brain activity of liberals and conservatives. The study, titled, " Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans" was published in the non-profit, peer-reviewed publication, PLOS ONE.
The study tested brain function of 82 liberals and conservatives. But it's not the first. Interestingly, the findings are similar to another more light-hearted, but respected study commissioned by the BBC three years ago, oddly enough as the result of an Oscar-winning actor. The actor was even named a co-author of that study, and it brought about one of my very favorite quotes in recent years. More on it in a moment.
First though, in this recent report, the study noted that "although risk-taking behavior of Democrats (liberals) and Republicans (conservatives) did not differ, their brain activity did."
The difference was that Democrats showed "significantly greater activity in the left insula, while Republicans showed significantly greater activity in the right amygdala." What this suggested is that liberals and conservatives process thinking about risk differently.
Specifically, in more human English -- conservatives showed stronger reactions to situations of threat and conflict, while liberals generally sought out novelty and uncertainty. In other words, external threats "primed" conservatives more, and liberals were more "risk accepting."
Remarkably, using this data, researchers were able to predict political party identification 82.9% of the time.
As I said, this all reminded me of a very similar study I had read three years ago -- all the more memorable this week since bizarrely it has an actual Oscar connection -- and I tracked it down. It was easy to remember, I should note, since the tale includes a quote that I have come to love.
Every year, the BBC Today programme brings in five different public figures to be "guest editor" between Christmas and New Years and determine the content of the radio show. For December 28, 2010, the position went to Academy Award-winning actor Colin Firth (The King's Speech).
Among his several editorial choices -- which included a poetry reading -- was that he wanted to have some science on the show, as well, and requested that the BBC commission scientists to study the brains of politicians to find out if any political differences could be discovered.
What began as a playful suggestion remarkably turned in a well-regarded study published in Current Biology on which Firth himself is listed as a co-author. It's titled "Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults."
The research studied MRI scans of over 90 college students — as well as two politicians on opposite sides of the aisle, Labour MP Stephen Pound and Alan Duncan, the conservative minister of State for International Development. What the scientists found was that "conservatives have larger areas concerned with fear and anxiety while liberals have greater capacity for optimism and courage." Undetermined was whether the brain impacted political beliefs or if those beliefs affected the development of the brain. As some subsequently observed, though, this might explain why fear as a motivating message works better with the right than left.
All of which lead to my absolute favorite quote. After the findings were released and the show broadcast, Colin Firth commented -- "I took this on as a fairly frivolous exercise: I just decided to find out what was biologically wrong with people who don't agree with me and see what scientists had to say about it and they actually came up with something."
At this point in the article, I posted a link to the BBC segment on the study. Unfortunately, the audio is no longer available. In it's place, though, I have an enjoyable and thoughtful 7-minute interview with Colin Firth talking about his experience as "guest editor" and commissioning the study.
On Friday night, Elton John gave a concert outside at the White House on the South Lawn. He called it "A Night When Hope and History Rhyme.” Afterwards, President Biden and the First Lady joined John on stage -- and made a presentation that the musician was clearly not expecting, and just as clearly overwhelmed by. Here's the touching video. That he's being honored for this particular reason is all the more notable -- for Elton John and the decision to give him the medal.
This is a remarkable Q&A from Eric Swalwell during a House hearing (perhaps earlier today?) on abortion. Despite clearly being stunned by the bizarre answer from a witness, he handles it beautifully. And it again shows impactfully the trouble that conservatives have in dealing with their wish to get rid of all abortions, which sounds great in stump speeches but proving difficult in reality.
Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting.
Feedspot Badge of Honor