Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

To Read or Not to Read, That is the Question

6/12/2013

3 Comments

 
I was discussing with my friend from college, the TV guru Wally Podrazik (curator for the Museum of Broadcast Communication), the subject of reading about plays and movies before seeing them.  It turns out that he is like a Zen master when it comes to avoiding reading anything beforehand.  I'm not nearly at his level, although I don’t read any reviews about movies and plays before I see them.  My reasoning goes back years.  I just figure, if I know that I want to see something, I simply don’t care about anyone’s opinion first before I formulate my own, and I most definitely don’t want something given away. 

(A quick note about Wally.  You know how as a kid, you'd sometimes have a gradeschool assignment that tangentially, sort of involved possibly watching something on TV, and you'd be so thrilled to tell your parents, "But I have to watch, it's for school!"  Well, Wally has turned that into an art form and career.  He's written 10 books about watching television, and his continually updated and most successful book -- written with another Northwestern classmate, Harry Castleman -- is titled...well, yeah...Watching TV.  Which is the name of his website.  Among other things, he's an adjunct lecturer on media at the University of Illinois at Chicago and has coordinated the media at far too many Democratic Conventions to count,   But I digress...)

Anyway, like Wally, I tend not to read articles either, though sometimes I will.  In part, that's because it’s my field, and so it’s important to be aware of what’s going on.  But as for reviews beforehand, nah, not for me.

My stance on reviews has grown to include rarely reading them.  Sometimes I'll save them to read afterwards, if my interest is just so high, but generally I've recognized over the years that it's all just opinion, even if expert opinion.  This understanding began when I worked for the Ravinia Music Festival during summers in my late-college years, and one of my jobs was to clip the reviews.  I specifically remember on day when I read the reviews by the critics of the Chicago Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune.  They were likely sitting in the exact same row.  One of them wrote that the Chicago Symphony Chorus was good, but too loud.  And the other wrote that the chorus was wonderful, "when you could hear them."  Right then and there I recognized, well, okay, that's sure just pure, total subjective opinion.  No matter how expert.

But it was one particular experience while in college at Northwestern that really drummed in the point about not reading reviews if you don't want something given away.  And therein lies the tale.  (Don't worry, I will not give anything away.  Really.  Nothing.)

It concerns the stageplay, Sleuth, by Anthony Shaffer. 

(And especially because it about Sleuth, of all plays -- a play so full of twists and turns that in the programs they ask that nothing about the plot be given away -- I really, truly will not be giving a single thing away.)

The tale even starts further in the past.  Back in high school, I subscribed to a wonderful, venerable old magazine, The Illustrated London News, which dated back to the 1800s.  One day, they had a review of a brand new play, something called Sleuth.  The first paragraph said something about it being the greatest stage mystery since The Mousetrap, and waxed eloquently on its brilliance and surprises.  It even noted that the program asked people not to give anything away about the plot.  And I stopped right there.  I thought – “Gee, if it’s this great, it’ll come to New York.  And if it does well there, it’ll come to Chicago.”  So, I read nothing more about it, anywhere.

About 18 months later, it did indeed open on Broadway.  Again, I refused to read anything about, thinking – “Gee, if it’s this great, and if it does well in New York, it’ll come to Chicago.”  All I did was look at headlines to see if it would likely be a success, and therefore come to Chicago.  The reviews were all utterly glowing.  So, I continued read nothing more about it.Another 18 months or so later, Sleuth finally came to Chicago.  I got my ticket immediately.  And I still read nothing about it.  I looked at headlines, to see if it was a good production, and they were continued raves.  I read nothing else about the show.  I was at Northwestern at the time, now.

I had tickets for the show the coming Wednesday matinee.  The prior Sunday, I picked up the Sun-Times and saw that in their entertainment section there was an interview with one of the actors.  Well, okay, I thought, it’s just a profile with the actor, not the play.  And I like the guy – I think it was Donal Donnelly, who I’d seen before – so I was interested.  Not a problem, I’ll read it.  I got about two paragraphs in, when I stopped.  “Y’know, “ I thought, “I’ve waited three years to see this play without reading a single word.  Why start now?  Why risk anything when I’m seeing it in three days?”  So, I stopped.

I went to see Sleuth at that matinee and absolutely loved it.  Just one of the great theater experiences of my life, still to this day.  Well-worth the wait, and well-worth holding off reading anything for the surprises.  And remarkable surprises there were, throughout the play.

I returned to my dorm room and now finally, after all these years, read the article I had started, but had put down.  Putting it down was one of the best decisions I’ve ever made – because there, in the middle of the article, despite the program asking people not to give anything away about the plot…the reporter mentions, not just one of the many plot twists, but THE BIGGEST FREAKING SURPRISE in the play.  (If you've seen Sleuth, you probably know what I'm referring to without saying more.  It's that big.  If you haven't seen it, trust me -- the surprise is that big.)

What the reporter did wasn't just talk about the plot (which, again, the program asks you not to do), the article gave away the very heart of the play!  Can you imagine my reaction if, after waiting three years to see the play, waiting three years not even reading a word about the play, I had read that article just three days before seeing the play??!!  Chicago might have been minus one newspaper building the next week.  And I’d have been livid with myself.

As I said, this experience was one of the prime reasons I stopped reading about plays or movies before I saw them.

It is something I heartily recommend to others.  But it requires a certain patience and trust, so your mileage may vary.

But if you haven't seen Sleuth, at least rent it now.  Definitely not the remake, but the original 1972 version that starred Laurence Olivier and MIchael Caine, both of whom got Oscar nominations, and also, checking iMDB after all these years (because my memory of the screen credits has dimmed), they list Alec Cawthorne as 'Inspector Doppler," John Matthews, and Eve Channing.  The entire cast of the original is tremendous.

And if managed to know nothing about it before watching, keep it that way.  Don't start now.



3 Comments
Douglass Abramson
6/12/2013 03:28:42 pm

I'll second your enthusiasm for the 1972 movie. Its one of a handful of films that I'll watch whenever I find it on TV. I was also deeply disappointed by the remake. Michael Caine playing the Olivier part now? Jude Law playing the Michael Caine roll? For the second time, I believe. I'm pretty sure that Sleuth cam after the Alfie remake. (Never saw that one) One of my favorite directors; who'd already produced a damn fine mystery movie. (Dead again) How could it go wrong? I found out about two hours later, when I exited the theater.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
6/12/2013 03:52:30 pm

And you left out a screenplay the legendary Harold Pinter.

(Yes, it came after the "Alfie" remake.)

How could it go wrong is a good question. But I think it starts with that credential, "Screenplay by Harold Pinter." I love defending writers, but can't here. It's not that the screenplay was bad -- it wasn't -- just wrong. "Sleuth" works because it's an intricate jigsaw puzzle game, where every single piece has to fit. Pinter kept the structure, but he rewrote literally everything and gave it a Pinteresque subtext. It was interesting, but it wasn't "Sleuth."

Years back, I happened to work on an event for a few days with Anthony Shaffer, who wrote "Sleuth" (both the play and the movie). I liked him, and it was clear from what he said about "Sleuth" what the point was -- games about playing games. Not all the psychological underpinings that Pinter put in that might work great in a Pinter play, but this was "Sleuth." There was psychology, but the games came first. When you start to tinker with that, it falls apart.

Reply
Douglass Abramson
6/12/2013 11:19:26 pm

I'd forgot about Pinter; but I have avoided the remake since its theatrical release. I know who Mr. Pinter is, but other than Sleuth, the closest I've ever come to his work is hearing Elaine Stritch sing "Ladies Who Lunch", I'm not qualified to comment on his script. I'd never reflected on just how much the bones of the story differs between the two movies, but now that you have pointed it out, I can see it. I would think that it is a total coincidence, but the differing tones are reflected in the respective settings of the movies. The original: a gem of a murder mystery game, set in an almost Gothic manor/carnival midway from hell. The remake: a psychological study of two very unlikable people; set in a cold, ultra modern house.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.



    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Busienss
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2023
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like