Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

Tarnished Gold

1/13/2015

2 Comments

 
Well, the Golden Globes are over, and the world survived again. I still have absolutely zero idea who won anything.  Because I really couldn't even begin to care less.

I mention this because I realized something yesterday which surprised even me about how incredibly little I (or anyone) should care.  It surprised me because, for all the years I've explained in detail how pointless and a scam the Golden Globes are, this particular fact never occurred to me.  And took this silly award show to new, unimagined depths.

(And yes, I do actually know it's just a silly award show.  But then, as the Founding Fathers wrote, all silliness is not created equal. And ultimately, many millions of people do actually watch.)

What I always say -- and wrote in my article here the other day (and post every year) -- is that there are only a paltry 86 voting members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.  That's not much more than if your office had a pool.  And just about as qualified, given that those in the HFPA who vote are largely just stringers, not the critics and head film writers of the newspapers they're connected with -- or were, I should say, since many of them are likely long-since retired.

But what occurred to me yesterday is that that "86" is the wrong number to focus on as a matter of disdain.  It's merely the number of voting members of the HFPA.  Not the number of people who actually selected the person or film that "won" in any category.

I'm going to make some assumptions here, since the voting is secret.  But they're assumptions based on elementary school math and basic logic.

The five nominees in any category are what the HFPA has determined are the five best and likely pretty close to one another in appreciation and craft. Obviously they're not exactly at the same level -- occasionally there's a run-away favorite, or an unlikely long-shot -- but in general, I think it's fair to say that there's a reasonably-level field in each category.

Simple math tells us that if you divide the 86 members by the five nominees, you get an average of 17 (with one left over, for the "winner").  What this means is that if a category is tight, the "winner" of a Golden Globe received a grand total of 18 votes.

18 votes.

It's math.  The law of averages.  Hey, you can't fudge long division.

And that is what the TV audience is watching and anxiously anticipating.  An award determined by 18 votes.  From semi-retired stringers.

Now, yes, I know that the votes aren't likely to break down that evenly in most categories.  So, let's be fair, bend way over backwards and raise the base by a whopping 50%.  That would give the "winner" 27 whole votes, and leave the other nominees with an average of just 15 votes a person.  That would be "winning" by almost 2-to-1.  Even for a runaway favorite that's a pretty huge landslide margin.  Yet it's still a mere 27 votes -- for a landslide "winner."

Again, I completely understand that for some categories the results might well be different, and on a rare occasion there might be a massive. clear-cut favorite who simply overwhelms the others.  But I think it's reasonable to think that most categories are pretty level, and the range generally is what basic math and the law of averages say it must be.

And so it was that yesterday the math popped into my head, and I realized a Golden Globe "winner" -- receiving this great honor -- most-often likely gets between merely 18 to 27 votes.  From semi-retired stringers.

Just remember that the next time you read about who "won" a treasured Golden Globe award.  The faux "Precursor" of the Oscars.

In the meantime, you might want to see about whether your company can get its office pool broadcast on network television...
2 Comments
Arlene Paige
1/13/2015 09:34:29 pm

I've worked at the polls on election day in Beverly Hills, most often up on Mulholland Drive where, in it's hayday, some very famous types lived. Now... ultimately the numbers are huge, especially in a presidential election. But here's how it breaks down: at least half of the country's voting population won't bother to register, and of the registered voters, less than half actually cast a ballot, including absentee ballots or people permanently registered to mail in their ballots. So less than one quarter of the nation votes. Of these, the party lines hold as distributed throughout the state. For example, Los Angeles always goes Democratic and upstate CA always goes Republican. There are only very rare deviations, like John Kennedy attracted Republicans. What's left up for grabs is actually a tiny amount and is horribly courted, often by people with radical or minority commitments. In Los Angeles it's commonplace for Democrats to hand out bags of potato chips to get homeless people to register and vote Democrat. The amount of homeless people, since it's very hard to count, is thought to be upward of 250,000 in Los Angeles County alone. Many people have complained, for decades, that Jews control the vote because of their civic commitment to organization, in pretty much the same way as undesirable are dragged to the poles. So... though for the first time ever I didn't watch the Golden Globes this year (slept through it... a long nap after an all-nighter)... I still always enjoy their nominations and choices. It's a select minority that's not just alcoholic. One year I chatted with the German journalist who was President of the organization... a really lovely man. He went home after his tenure. I guess not everyone has his charm or insight, but probably many do. Beats the tato chip gang. :-) What's really important is... what do you think of George Clooney?

Reply
Robert Elisberg
1/14/2015 01:13:01 am

I repeat -- any office pool would have a voting size similar to the HFPA, but that office isn't given a national 3-hour TV broadcast. That's the point. Numerous groups give out awards - we properly find out their results from a press release. Whether or not one likes those results is a separate matter.

Again, public perception of who the *entire* HFPA is differs profoundly from reality. Meeting one member years ago doesn't alter that, nor is it really the best way to determine any group's full membership. Ultimately, working at election polls in Beverly Hills has little application to the Golden Globes. (What Jews and dragging undesirables to the polls has to do with any of this I have yet to figure out...)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like