Five years ago, I wrote a piece entitled, “The Greatest Musical You’ve Never Heard of.” I felt absolutely comfortable with the claim. There might be greater musicals, and there might be musicals more obscure. But for “great” AND “obscure,” I stand by my statement about Fiorello! It’s the greatest musical you’ve never heard of. And if you have heard of it, you get Theater Genie bonus points. And now, for reasons which I’ll explain (and which further support my assertion…), it turns out that this is the exact right time to bring that column back and repeat its evidence. Fiorello!, you see, was the very first musical chosen by the renowned Encores! series in New York, where the NY City Center brings back great, less-known shows, in trimmed down productions. And now, in honor of the series’ 20th anniversary…they are bringing Fiorello! back. It runs from January 30-February 3. If you live anywhere near the New York area (and I’m told that quite a few people do), rush to get tickets to this rare treat. It shouldn’t be rare, but it is. The musical was written by the creators of Fiddler on the Roof, Sheldon Harnick and Jerry Bock. Mr. Harnick is still around, and over the years he and Mr. Bock actually have tweaked the show, writing new, important material for Fiorello, and fixing some lyrics in the original production. So, that makes this new version all the more a treat. I’d just like to re-iterate a point made in the accompanying article. Fiorello! not only tied for Best Musical with The Sound of Music, it won the Pulitzer Prize. Only eight musicals have won the Pulitzer Prize in the history of Broadway – and all of them have been recorded for either movies or TV, except for Fiorello! and Next to Normal which only won three years ago. At the very least, Fiorello! deserves a TV production on PBS, or HBO or Bravo. And it’s wrong-headed that it’s never happened. For years, the charge was that it was merely a New York show, about a New York mayor. But that was because at the time of its original production, the real Fiorello LaGuardia (after whom the airport is named) had only been dead for about 10 years. He was a very current personality in in 1959. But half a century has passed. The story of Fiorello! is no more about New York than Hamlet is about Denmark. The story is about beating unbeatable odds and breaking corruption and injustice, in order to bring good government and responsibility to the American public. And it’s a remarkable love story. Fortunately, over the intervening years since I wrote the article, Fiorello! has been gathering a few more productions, and a few more people are learning about it and how wonderful it is. And now more will in New York at Encores! But it deserves a full-fledged revival and a TV production. Enough already, it’s time. Also fortunately, since writing the original article, I’ve become friendly with the show’s lyricist Sheldon Harnick, and more of a gem and gentleman it’s hard to find. And he’s still working, actively, after all these years, including a fascinating, new one-man musical in the works. And how great that he gets to see Fiorello! play once again in New York. Now, if only that could be expanded on, and that no one ever has to refer to Fiorello! again as – * * * The Greatest Musical You’ve Never Heard Of It’s rare, indeed close to impossible, when one can make a subjective opinion and have it be objective and demonstrably provable. I believe this is one of those times. The musical in question won the Pulitzer Prize. Emphatically a notable standard. But further, at the time it won – 1959 – it was only the third musical ever to win the award. (The two previous were the renowned Of Thee I Sing by the Gershwins and South Pacific.) So, this isn’t only a high honor, but you’re in rarified air. Countless great musicals haven’t won the Pulitzer Prize. Oklahoma! didn’t win a Pulitzer Prize. Neither did My Fair Lady, The Music Man, West Side Story or Gypsy. Or…well, fill in the blank. It’s a long blank. The evidence goes deeper. It won the Tony Award for Best Musical. Among the shows it beat that year was Gypsy. That’s a pretty good trick. Actually, it tied as Best Musical that year, with The Sound of Music. But that didn’t win the Pulitzer Prize either. (Only this show, just the third ever.) So, okay, it won the Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award, and beat Gypsy. And tied The Sound of Music. Any objective observer would have to admit its credentials are firmly-established. Are there better shows? That’s of course subjective and personal opinion – and not the point here. The point is that this is the greatest musical that is unknown. The show is…are you ready? Fiorello! Right now, theater geeks aside, pretty much everyone is scratching their collective heads, going, “Hunh?” Considering that oceans of Hunhs, it’s a safe bet to say objectively that Fiorello! is the greatest, unknown musical in Broadway history. No quibbling here. I’m not talking “little known.” Not “underappreciated.” Not “cult favorite.” I’m talking precisely in the truest and exact sense of the word – literally unknown. “You have never heard of it,” that kind of unknown. AND greatest: winner of the Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award greatest. Not “Well, my own personal favorite is….” Not “Y’know what’s also good is…” Top these honors and you can chime in. Unknown and greatest. You have to meet both criteria. Fiorello! is it. As noted, obviously there are some savants who know of Fiorello! You don’t win a Pulitzer and Tony and stay completely blanked out. Yet even among this small group of theatrical archivists who know of Fiorello! and love Fiorello! and defend the honor of Fiorello! -- I would bet cash money that almost none of them have ever even seen Fiorello! Not as a movie, not as TV special, not as a community theater production, not as high school show, not as anything. Not. Not seen. Since its initial run on Broadway of 795 performances 49 years ago, the musical just isn’t done. So even for those to whom it’s not utterly unidentifiable, it most likely is unseen. Unknown. (Though not unheard. Its score has carried its legend. Written by Sheldon Harnick and Jerry Bock, the team would soon go on to write another Tony-winning Best Musical that brought them far more fame: “Fiddler on the Roof.” The score of Fiorello! is simply ethereally remarkable. Lush, hilarious, poignant, and vibrantly lyrical yet sounding like everyday conversation. A near-impossible task.) So, what is Fiorello!, I hear you cry. It’s the story of Fiorello LaGuardia. (Hunh, you again say?) Have you ever flown into New York City and landed at LaGuardia Airport? He’s that LaGuardia. The former mayor of New York who defeated the powerful and criminal Tammany Hall political organization, helping break its back and restore honest government to the city. His own personal story is as fascinating as his political one, including being a World War I hero, volunteering to fight in the Air Force while he was still a U.S. Congressman. That’s one of the likely reasons the show has rarely been done since its initial run. People seem to think it’s only of interest to New Yorkers of that era. It’s a foolish thought – no less so than thinking only the early Danes would care about seeing a show on their prince named Hamlet. Fiorello! is a story of decency, humanity and good triumphing over criminal, against insurmountable odds. It’s about breaking corruption and injustice, in order to bring good government and responsibility to the American public. And in the midst of it all, a double love story. There’s no reason this musical should not be done by local theaters or schools all across the country. Or revived on Broadway. It’s too great and about subjects far too interesting and meaningful to the public. Next year is its 50th anniversary. If PBS has half a brain and soul (which it does), they should mount a production for “Great Performances.” Legions who’ve only heard of Fiorello! and been dying to see it would flock to watch. (It should have been done by PBS during the 1976 Bicentennial. I made an effort to interest them at the time, but was just a neophyte with no real access to anyone who mattered. To show how further-stupid it was that PBS didn’t do the musical then – they could have used its original Broadway star to recreate his role. He was unknown when Fiorello! opened on Broadway, but by 1976 he was a Really Big TV Star. Tom Bosley – who at the time was playing the father, ‘Howard Cunningham’ on the series Happy Days. But alas, PBS – indeed everyone – missed the opportunity and blew it.) But there’s no reason to blow it again. And if anyone needs even further proof about the viability of Fiorello! today with audiences not from New York, they need only look at the TimeLine Theatre in Chicago.
TimeLine is an excellent company that does shows of historic interest, designing its lobby to recreate a sense of the era. They did Fiorello! two years ago, and it was their biggest hit ever, but were unable to extend the run. They had never before brought a show back, but did this year with “Fiorello!,” in large part because it is a political year. Much of the same cast is in its revival, and it’s again a major hit, selling out every performance. And its run extended again. (The Chicago Tribune called it even better this time. The Chicago Sun-Times said it was “wildly ambitious, wholly exhilarating” and “every bit as sensational the second time around.”) “Politics and Poker” and “Little Tin Box” are as funny and yet meaningful songs as you’ll hear. “When Did I Fall in Love?” may be one of the most gorgeous love songs ever. “On the Side of the Angels” is exhilarating in its elegance, simplicity, hilarity and curmudgeonly counterpoint. “’Til Tomorrow” evokes a bygone era with heartbreaking beauty. And these only touch the surface. (Though this isn’t a review of that TimeLine production, which I saw and was bowled over by, out of fairness I’d like to note such cast members as PJ Powers as ‘Fiorello,’ Terry Hamilton, Michael Kingston, Rebecca Finnegan, Andrea Prestinario, Maris Hudson and Alan Scmuckler, all superbly and inventively directed by Nick Bowling. The supporting performers were all gems, as well.) Sheldon Harnick himself was slightly involved with the TimeLine production. He’s tweaked a few of the lyrics over the years, and not only smoothed out its one glitch in “I’ll Marry the Very Next Man,” but with Jerry Bock added a reprise of “The Name’s LaGuardia,” which richly deepens the show and character’s emotion. (TimeLine has a link on their website to an engrossing hour-long interview with Harnick they did before a live audience.) More companies should learn from the example of TimeLine: Fiorello! deserves to be done, and has shown that audiences will flock to it – even if they’re not from New York, and even if 50 years have passed. (The Reprise! organization in Los Angeles did an abridged version of it to great success a decade ago. And in New York, it was the very first presentation of the Encore! series back in 1994.) Indeed, this TimeLine production should tour – to New York, even. After all, there’s a strong tradition of Chicago to Broadway Tony-winning transplants. With a book by Jerome Weidman and the legendary George Abbott, it’s a remarkable, Pulitzer Prize-winning, Tony Award-winning, great musical on its own merits, that perhaps holds even deeper meaning to audiences today bombarded with the trivial in political campaigning, when 81% of the American public are saying the country has “pretty seriously” gotten off-track. Fiorello LaGuardia faced a city that had gotten seriously off-track, and put it back on, showing that decency in politics can succeed. Here’s hoping PBS – or some network – does a production next year for the show’s 50th anniversary. At the very least, do yourself a favor by picking up a CD of the cast album. And be enthralled by the greatest musical you’ve never heard of. * * * Now, here is a classic clip of Tom Bosley recreating his role as ‘Fiorello’ at the 1971 Tony Awards,
8 Comments
Lisa Kadonaga
10/27/2019 01:32:13 am
I found out by accident recently that a theatre company in Edmonton Alberta put on a version of this show in 2012 (only a few months before the NYU production, and the Encores! one). Apparently the group, the "Plain Janes", have made it their mission to introduce audiences to "terrific little musicals that have somehow been lost to traditional theatre canon". Besides budgetary constraints (though I've heard that Edmonton has a strong theatre scene, it's just not as big as Vancouver or Toronto, let alone New York), they also had to fit it into the format of the local Fringe festival, which tends to favour shorter shows. It seems that they used a cast of six (three male and three female performers), merged the two acts into one, and managed to trim the production down to under an hour and a half.
Reply
Robert Elisberg
10/27/2019 09:47:53 am
What I'd be most-interested about is whether or not they had a prior agreement to "trim" the show. If they did, then good that it went well. If they didn't have permission (and I suspect that they didn't), then I'm pretty certain that the authors and rights-holders would be furious As a writer myself, I think most authors would be very upset that someone changed their work without asking, and most performance rights-holders wouldn't allow it -- which is the point of owning the performance rights. In fact, according to the Dramatist Guild contract for original productions, no one is allowed to change a single word without the authors' permission. And keep in mind, too, that these works are also under copyright. So, one can't just change the text -- or anything that is protected by copyright -- and break the copyright. So, to me, it seems near-certain that editing down an entire show without approval would be problematic if authors, copyright holders and performance-rights holders knew about it, no matter how well-received it was. (In "Fiorello's" case, they're in a position of saying, "Well, we were pretty-well received, too -- we won the Tony Award and Pulitzer Prize.) So, I'd actually be very surprised if someone tried something similar.
Reply
Lisa Kadonaga
11/2/2019 02:20:18 am
I can definitely understand your feelings about unauthorized edits -- most of what I've written is non-fiction, and I've had academic papers and book chapters that had their main conclusions altered (going way beyond trimming). Not a great situation, if I end up being confronted about something that I didn't even write in the first place. So I can imagine that having a novel or play messed up would be even worse.
Reply
Robert Elisberg
11/2/2019 10:33:04 am
I would never assume someone would have noticed by now. Each instance would be unique -- totally separate from the others. That it's happened multiple times is meaningless: rights holders of a show would have little interest in those of another. Indeed, depending on the show, it might have 1,000 productions *each year* to track. And Edmonton is FAR off the radar of New York City, which thinks of itself as the center of the universe, to whom Delaware is likely seen as another planet and Kansas may not even appear on the map. Show try out in *Boston* because they're far out of the purview of NYC. Being in another country, and 2,000 away may be the equivalent of interstellar exploration.
Reply
Lisa Kadonaga
11/2/2019 10:11:45 pm
It sounds like there's a concert adaptation of Fiorello! (by John Weidman, son of the original primary author of the 1959 book). I assume that there's a much higher chance of it having received copyright permission than if someone else had done the rewriting. (It's the one that was used for the Encores! production in 2013. Also I've found some evidence online, in NY Times and Variety reviews from 1994, that it -- or an earlier version -- was used for Encores! back then too.) Apparently it's much shorter than the original -- and since the musical numbers were intact, the dialogue etc. must have been edited.
Reply
Robert Elisberg
11/2/2019 11:16:08 pm
If there's a concert version, it would still have to have been done by the rights-holders. It's certainly possible that this is the version the Edmonton group used -- though there might be stipulations that if this version it used, it must be for a concert production, not a fully-staged one. Though I don't know about that. (What I also don't know is if the Edmonton group put on a concert production. For all I know they did -- a concert production, like the one Encore did, can still be pretty elaborate.)
Reply
Robert Elisberg
7/6/2023 11:28:03 am
SDN, Thanks much for your note. (And fine taste in musicals...)
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRobert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. Feedspot Badge of Honor
Archives
November 2024
Categories
All
|
© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2024
|