Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

MSNB-See

4/6/2016

0 Comments

 
Interesting news for folks who watch cable TV news ratings.

Last Friday, The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC had more young viewers in the 25-54 age group than Fox News did for any program airing between 4 PM-11 PM.

As reported by Jason Easley of PoliticsUSA, Maddow's 315,000 Friday night viewers in that prized demographic "was bigger that both The O’Reilly Factor (301,000) and The Kelly File (280,000) on Fox News. Maddow’s show had the largest 25-54 audience of any of the programs on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News."  

Fox News still won the night in overall viewers, though as Easley points out, MSNBC is not on basic cable and appears in fewer homes, yet Maddow "came within 500,000 total viewers of beating Fox News in her 9 PM timeslot."  Left out of that analysis, importantly, is that if anyone wants to watch conservative news, they have Fox News to watch.  But if anyone wants to watch anything other than far-right coverage, the market is divided between MSNBC and CNN -- as well as the network news shows.

By the way, continuing with MSNBC, I've wanted to comment on a recent story concerning the news channel, but never got around to it.  This seems as reasonable a jumping-off point as any.

A month or so back, MSNBC seemed to be easing host Melissa Harris-Perry from her show's timeslot.  She was offended by her treatment and became very public about being "silenced" (as she put it), as well as having her show pre-empted for two consecutive weekends.  Eventually, she and MSNBC parted ways.  She turned down a severance package because it contained what was basically a non-disparagement clause.

My first reaction was -- pre-empted for two whole weekends in a row?  Horrors.  Welcome to TV.  Pre-empted during an especially-volatile presidential primary campaign for specific, other coverage?  Horrors.  Welcome to TV.  Not treated well by a network?  Horrors.  Welcome to TV.  

(By way of comparison, another Melissa -- McCarthy -- had starred on CBS for six years in the successful sitcom, Mike and Molly.  She is probably the #1 movie comedy actress today, as well.  And when CBS cancelled the series a couple months ago, despite still-okay ratings, no one at the network even officially notified her.  The show just wasn't put on the new schedule, and CBS later sent out a Tweet.  You'd think that a network would want to keep on great terms with someone they might really want to be in business with again, as either a star or series creator.  But networks are networks, and they just dumped it.  Emmy-winner McCarthy put out her own Tweet about how "shocked and heartbroken" she was, and that "I would have shot this show for 50 more years.  I'll miss my 2nd family."  But networks are networks.  That's not a defense of them.  Just an obvious observation.)

To be clear, that's no reason for Melissa Harris-Perry not to be upset and even speak out.  Networks deserve being criticized when they act poorly.  (If that's the case here.)  But she seemed so shocked by it all, and appeared to take it as a personal affront.  In fact, however, MSNBC said there were no plans to cancel her show or even strip Harris-Perry of editorial control.  The show just got pre-empted twice for bigger news.  It happens.  Maybe they planned to scale it back, eventually, too -- a network doesn't tend to pre-empt shows twice that are hugely popular, so I suspect the ratings haven't been strong, but that's just a guess.

There's one thing I do have a more direct reaction to, though.  And that's a personal reaction to this all.  I think Melissa Harris-Perry is a very bright, accomplished, well-spoken person.  When she's appeared on MSNBC as a guest analyst, I've always enjoyed watching her and hearing her insight.  But -- as a host?  I found her unwatchable.  Rather than speaking off the cuff, how she did as a guest analyst and effectively so, when appearing as the host of her own program and tied to a script that was well-prepared for book publication but not the spoken word (which I assume she herself wrote or at least edited), she came across precisely as she is -- a bright college professor.  Her show always struck me as if I was in class, and not one of those where the professor tries to involve her students by sparking their interest, but instead gives a lecture, writing everything out first and reading her speech.  All that was missing were footnotes and, at the end, "Class dismissed."  I gave up on the stilted show early on, I couldn't make it through.  Occasionally, I'd check it out, but after about 40 seconds I'd have to switch away, concerned that I hadn't been taking notes for the mid-term.

Rachel Maddow is scholarly herself and has a PhD, and she can get pedantic at times, but does so with near-unbridled enthusiasm which she seems to want to bring to her viewers, having grasped the concept of communication.  Prof. Harris-Perry seems want to deliver an editorial with every word.  It's not the way she ever was when a guest analyst, which was to me the great shame.

I understand completely why Melissa Harris-Perry was upset that her show had been pre-empted two consecutive weeks.  And I understand if she felt she was being marginalized, if in fact she was (which is open to debate).  But the TV world is abrupt, and you have to deliver or they move on.  And more to the point, if the show was being cut back -- which, again, may not have been the case -- it was probably because it wasn't good-enough television and had low viewers.  

So, be upset if you're Melissa Harris-Perry.  But be upset for the right reason, that you don't like losing your show, same as anyone would be upset.  Not because you were "silenced" and ill-treated and wronged.  But, y'know, I'll even step back and acknowledge in full honesty that I don't know what was going on behind the scenes.  For all I know, MSNBC handled things poorly.  Maybe not, and my guess is not, but I don't know, so for the sake of argument, I'll accept that.  I still personally found the show unwatchable.  So, I'm not surprised by its pre-emptions or now its absence, nor am troubled by it.

I wish that Melissa Harris-Perry had not been so troubled and whiny about it all, though -- not because it seemed so petty, but because I really like her as a guest analyst and would have loved to continue seeing her in that capacity on MSNBC, something I now am guessing has as much chance as the proverbial snow ball in hell.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like