Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

Jeb Bush: The Mini-Series

6/1/2015

5 Comments

 
I'm getting less certain by the day that Jeb Bush will end up with the GOP nomination, because once again he has shown that he doesn't have an answer for his biggest hurdle:  anything that has to do with his brother.  And so, to my bewilderment, within a mere matter of weeks, here's my fourth (!) column about the former Republican governor of Florida.

Moreover he's not only proving that he hasn't figured out an answer to questions about his brother, the former president (which is horrible, considering that's he's known for years as he prepared to run that these questions would obviously be coming and he's had that long to prepare), but he's now attacking Republicans, and worse he's showing that being out of political office for eight years has made him rustier than is ideal when you want to be The Most Powerful Man in the World..

On Sunday, appearing on the CBS program Face the Nation, he told host Bob Schieffer, when asked about the huge budget deficit that had skyrocketed during the George W. Bush Administration: “I mean, because of the war and because of the focus on protecting the homeland, I think he let the Republican Congress get a little out of control, in terms of the spending."

This is so wrong is so many different ways, but let's just focus on this: 

Given that it's the president who prepares the budget, Jeb Bush's comments is a seriously questionable tactic to take.  And given that he's slamming his own party, it's an even more questionable one.  And "a little out of control" is a pretty eye-rolling, clueless phrase when you consider that what his brother George W. did was oversee the economic crash of the country, bringing about a recession that came close to bordering the Great Depression. Describing the economic meltdown during Bush 43 as "a little out of control" is like calling the Grand Canyon a little pothole.  The Titanic was "a little out of control" compared to the collapse of the U.S. economy during the term of the elder Bush brother.

And further, it's that very same Great Depression that causes the biggest problem for his answer --

That's because when Franklin Roosevelt became president after the Great Depression had hit, he turned that economic collapse around with the New Deal.  And for the past 70 years, Republicans have fallen over themselves desperately trying to convince a hoped-for gullible public that it wasn't because of the New Deal social programs at all that got the United States out of the Great Depression, but rather the sheer chance that World War II occurred, whose need for increased production spurred the economy.

Meanwhile, compare that to what Jeb Bush just said:  that when George W. Bush dealt with war -- and did so on a far smaller scale than WWII and its two fronts in Europe and Asia -- he didn't grow the economy but crashed it.  Somehow, gee, FDR was able to "control" the Democratic Congress, but GWB couldn't "control" the Republican one.

So, Jeb Bush has painted himself -- and painted the GOP, most especially if he gets the party's nomination as its standard bearer -- into a corner.  Either America got out of the Great Depression because of FDR's social programs, or the reason was the beneficial economics of war...in which case it shows that George W. Bush was as incompetent as the public and presidential historians believe.

The reality is that FDR did benefit from increased production during WWII, and also that the country benefited from the New Deal social programs.  But it's unlikely that we'll see Republicans give any credit to the latter, meaning the GWB incompetence scenario leaps to the forefront and will have to stand.

But no, Jeb Bush didn't stop there.

“We were under attack and he brought, he unified the country,” he also explained about his brother, the then-president. “And he showed dogged determination and he kept us safe."

Let's be really clear:  George Bush didn't "unify the country."  He tore it apart in divisive battle lines so virulent that still they're still being ripped.  The only way you could even consider saying he "unified the country" is in the public's condemnation of him, given that he left office with only a paltry 22% approval rating.

And contrary to the mantra that George W. Bush Kept Us Safe, it's critical to remember -- and always remember -- that under his "watch," 3,000 people actually died on American soil when George W. Bush was asleep at the wheel and ignoring Presidential Daily Briefings that said Osama Bin Laden was determined to attack the U.S. with airplanes.  And if you want to take it a step further, an additional 4,500 Americans died in the Iraq War which isn't the president's fault, no, except that that war was started on a lie and should never have occurred in the first place -- something 53% of the public believes today, compared to just 42% who disagree.

And still, Jeb Bush wasn't finished.  As he went on and told Mr. Schieffer:

"And you know, you can talk about a lot of stuff, but when you're president of the United States and you're confronted with that kind of event, to respond the way he did is admirable."

Just to be clear, and again by way of reminder, since Jeb Bush continues trying to rewrite history, the way George W. Bush responded to America being attacked and 3,000 people getting killed was that he froze and read the book My Pet Goat to schoolchildren.

But none of this is about George W. Bush.  It's about how with all his time to prepare, Jeb Bush still hasn't figured out how to respond to the legacy of his brother.  And for anyone who doesn't think this is a problem for him, consider that if actually wasn't a problem, Jeb Bush's answers would be oh-so-easy, praising through the roof his brother's eight years as president and exclaiming to the world what a brilliant job he did, rather than keep trying to figure out how talk himself out of a corner -- and now blame his own party.

And until he can come up with a way how to address the problem of his brother and not keep shooting himself in the foot, Jeb Bush not only is going to have a much harder time becoming president himself, let alone getting the GOP nomination, but simply convincing the public that if he can't handle questions this basic, how in the world can we expect him to handle the really difficult questions of being president?

Being president is hard work, his brother said.  Who'd have thought that for Jeb Bush simply running for president would be almost as hard.  Especially when you haven't even announced you're a candidate yet.

In the end, the problem for Jeb Bush isn't what I say here about him and all his stumbles.  It's what the other candidates say about him, as they spot his weakness, leap on each and every gaff once he gets up on a debate stage with them, see blood in the water, and start ganging up on the leader.

Actually, in the end, the problem for Jeb Bush is that this isn't "the end."  Because you know there will be more questions about his brother and more hiccups.  As far as mini-series go, this one is open-ended.

5 Comments
GregVB
6/1/2015 04:39:52 am

Many good points here, Robert (and great analogies to other "control issues)!

I do remember that GWB had enormous popularity ratings post-9/11 (through no work of his own -- again like being born on third base, a President should hopefully garner ratings as a nation circles the wagons), and then squandered it all to get those aforementioned poor ratings. He was a real two-fer as far as being a united, and not a divider. Remember when Letterman called GWB on that as a candidate, as GWB bombed, going on some tangent alluding to Letterman's operation? Dave's reaction during the entire "interview" was great: https://www.nytimes.com/learning/students/pop/articles/030200wh-gop-tv.html).

I am enjoying these flubs -- bet he wishes by now he'd listened to mommy. Now I'd like someone actually to go on the attack, asking Jeb essentially if he, too, would hand over reins of running the country to an unabashed, snarling psychopath. Hopefully, even the brain-dead who look back nostalgically at Shrub would remember The Dark Prince.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
6/1/2015 04:54:56 am

Dear Greg, yes, absolutely GWB had huge "popularity" immediately after 9/11. But that was the country rallying together after a disaster. What's always galled me, almost most of anything, is that George Bush had the WORLD united for the U.S. -- and he squandered *that*. Think of what an actually-united world could accomplish.

And yes, as I note at the end of my piece, the issue for Jeb Bush is not what "I" write, but once he announces his candidacy and there are debates, and his opponents go on the attack.

And perhaps the worst thing he's doing (or best, depending on your point of view, is that he's reminding everyone of the answers to when any on the far right say about GWB, "Miss him now?!" By his gaffs, Jeb is giving everyone (other Republican candidates, too) the opening to explain what his older brother did that was So bad.

Reply
mark palko link
6/3/2015 07:53:22 am

"Republicans have fallen over themselves desperately trying to convince a hoped-for gullible public that it wasn't because of the New Deal social programs at all that got the United States out of the Great Depression, but rather the sheer chance that World War II occurred, whose need for increased production spurred the economy."

Not quite. Paul Krugman's blog is the go-to source here, but, put briefly, this kind of economy-spurring is Keynesian, and you would be hard pressed to find a Keynesian Republican these days.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
6/3/2015 09:33:08 am

Mark, Thanks for your note, though I'm not quite sure of what you're saying here -- though my perception is that we disagree. I've yet to hear a Republican give credit to FDR for getting America out of the Depression because of his New Deal social programs. It has nothing to do with whether or not anyone is Keynesian, but has everything to do with them giving credit to a Democrat, let alone a liberal Democrat. That leaves, "He was lucky that there was a war, since it ramped up industry production."

Reply
mark palko link
6/3/2015 01:39:00 pm

Robert,

I'm a statistician, not an economist, so I highly recommend fact-checking anything I have to say here (searching Krugman's blog for 'austerity' is a good place to start), but I'll give it my best shot.

A grossly oversimplified explanation:

Conventional liberal economist -- (Krugman et al.) the best and quickest way to end a slump caused by a lack of demand is to have the government run a big deficit and get the money back in flow by spending it or giving it away. This view holds that the New Deal was a move in the right direction and it did a lot of good but it was too small and timid. It took WWII to convince the government to run the massive deficits needed to fix the problem. Pro-stimulus economists in 2008 used these numbers to argue for a much bigger bill than we actually got.

(Krugman has had a very track record since the collapse)

Old (Milton Friedman era) conservative economist -- End slumps by increasing the money supply and/or increasing inflation. When you hear Rand Paul go on about debasing the currency, he's attacking what used to be conventional GOP economics.

Current conservative economist -- liquidationist/Randian/austerian (sp?) Hoover's cabinet was deeply into this stuff. Depressions are good because they purge the economy. The New Deal extended the Depression by discouraging people from working in the private sector. Government spending "crowds out" private investment. Austerity (cutting spending in a downturn) encourages investment by attracting what Paul Krugman calls "the confidence fairy."

(In this case, history, data, and logic all have a clear liberal bias.)

"He was lucky that there was a war, since it ramped up industry production." (and by the way, how often do you hear the word 'lucky' used to describe WWII?) is basically saying that building lots of tanks and bombers ended the Depression. That leads to the question "Why can't we do the same thing by building schools and bridges?" and that is not a conversation that the people at either the American Enterprise Institute or the Heritage Foundation want to have.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.



    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2023
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like