Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

How Not to Get Away with Journalism

9/23/2014

0 Comments

 
I'm a little late coming to the party about the NY Times/Alessandra Stanley controversy over the article she wrote about Shonda Rhimes, whose production company is making the new series, How to Get Away with Murder.  I’d seen the headlines about this, but didn’t read any of the stories, until getting a note from Nell Minow.  (As I've mentioned, Nell and I are chief executives of the "How to Apologize" Association, and she brought the coverage to my attention.  I’m now caught up.)

For those unaware, here's the original article written by Ms. Stanley, "Wrought in Rhimes's Image:  Viola Davis plays Shonda Rhimes's Lastest Tough Heroine.".  At issue were the opening sentence that included reference to executive producer Rhimes being an "Angry Black Woman" (a phrase repeated a few times in the piece) and a description of series star Viola Davis who doesn't "look at all like the typical star of a network drama. Ignoring the narrow beauty standards some African-American women are held to, Ms. Rhimes chose a performer who is older, darker-skinned and less classically beautiful."  

Reaction was swift, with cries of racism.  Shonda Rhimes herself sent out a series of funny, but blunt tweets, in particular noting that the Angry Black Woman who created the series for her company was in fact a man, Pete Nowak.  The New York Times Public Editor, Margaret Sullivan, chimed in yesterday with a long article here.

Among many things, she quoted a long, heartfelt letter from a reader who was deeply offended by the original article, including how Alessandra Stanley even got her facts wrong because Shonda Rhimes isn't the executive producer of the show, and she also included a response from Ms. Stanley that didn't really apologize at all and more said how "I feel bad" if people were offended, and that her description of Viola Davis was, in fact, taken from comments Ms. Davis herself made in an interview, and that her article had been vetted by three editors.  (One of whom is quoted as saying she "deeply regretted" that people were offended and for not being sensitive enough, offering suggestions for improving in the future)

It's worth reading the original article by Ms. Stanley and that by the Public Editor for this to make full, informed sense.  But in lieu of that, the greatly trimmed-down version will have to do.

I have various reactions.

Alessandra Stanley's non-apology was terrible.  It would be so easy to write a good apology, while defending her own work by, at the very least, starting with, “I am so sorry for not doing as effective a job as I hoped in how I phrased the article.  I love Shonda Rhimes’ work and admire what she does so well, especially how she rushes and fights against the tide.  I was trying to express that, and show how she has long contradicted the stereotype, and how Viola Davis herself contradicts the stereotype, as well, and that Ms. Rhimes does so wonderfully.  But I phrased things in a way and left out explanations, for which I apologize, and am upset because I was trying to say the very opposite.” 

I read the original article, and I found parts of it very thoughtful, and portions of it quite poorly written, but not racist.  It was indeed attempting to say very positive things about Shonda Rhimes's work -- that was its point -- and did say a lot of very positive things.  But it did so a few times in a few very thoughtless ways.  In fairness, I’m not in a position to really how others should react and say if something like this is racist, and I can understand why some might think so – but I suspect most of those didn’t read the actual, full article.  Just the headline-grabbing parts.  Though I'm sure some did.

I think that if Alessandra Stanley had made the same points in her article that she did in her poor response, she’d likely have been okay.  If in her article she’d have said, “As Viola Davis referred to herself in the NYT magazine, more bluntly…”, people would have understood.  And if she’d have referred to Shonda Rhimes being an “Angry Black Woman” as a “painful and insidious stereotype” (as she explains in her response), it would have been clear.  But to leave all that unspoken only allows them to take on a life of their own, and be read as written.

I can understand why she probably feels annoyed, “I wrote a valentine to her," she no doubt thought, "and people are trashing me as racist.”  But in too many parts she did do a poor job writing and didn't make her points clear, and should have acknowledged that.

I thought the best criticism was by Shonda Rhimes, who never suggested racism, just that the article seemed stupid.  As she points out, she didn’t even create the show, a man did.  (In fairness, the show does come from her company so it’s not like she had no involvement approving things every step of the way.  But still, she didn’t create it, and that should have been referenced clearly in the original article, another error.)

By the way, eloquent as that long letter was that the Public Editor printed from a reader, it too was wrong.  It says that Slanley got her facts wrong, and that  Shonda Rhimes isn’t the executive producer of the show.  In fact, the article was correct:  Rhimes is the executive producer.  The Public Editor should have corrected that.

For what it’s worth, this is a show I’ve been interested in seeing since I first saw it promoted.  I’m not completely sure of the premise, so I’m intrigued.  Whether it’s something I want to stick around for remains to be seen.  But it certainly looks interesting.

In the end – I thought the article was intended to highly praise Shonda Rhimes, but did a very poor job with some of its phrasing.  And she and the editors who vetted the original were, as some have suggested, far too tone-deaf in overlooking it,   There were highly-charged phrased being used, and they should have known that and not been so blithe in sliding over things.  And the apology explaining that was poor.  And finally, I’m sure that most commenters criticizing the article didn’t read it.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like