This should be an enjoyable video for most people, but especially those who have been watching the f/X mini-series, Fosse/Verdon. But surprisingly, it's particularly fun for the latter not because of the musical number, but the conversation that comes latter. The musical part, though, is quite wonderful. This is a clip from the old daytime talk show, The Mike Douglas Show. It's Gwen Verdon and Chita Rivera doing an absolutely great job performing one of my favorite songs from the Kander and Ebb musical Chicago that they starred in on Broadway (and then latter on tour in Los Angeles, where I saw them, as well as Jerry Orbach). And which was directed and choreographed by Bob Fosse. And then the song is followed by them doing the Hot Honey Rag. Making a appearance in between is Douglas's guest co-host for the week, Hal Linden, who fills in as the musical's emcee for the number. (Though most people know Linden for his series Barney Miller, he was an accomplished stage musical performer, and even won a Tony Award for the show, The Rothschilds, by Harnick and Bock.) The video continues afterwards for the talk portion of the evening, and often I'll click away at that point, but this time -- given the people involved -- I decided to keep watching...and am glad I did. That's because later in the interview, Gwen Verdon talks about a disastrous flop she was in, which as she was describing it, I felt certain that it was the show her character just began rehearsals for at the end of last week's episode of the mini-series -- and it's not going well -- called Children, Children. And sure enough, as she continues the story....it is! If you want to jump to that, it starts around the 8:00 mark. The video quality is not very good, it's quite washed out, but it's still a big treat -- whether you watch the interview or not. And for those who have been watching the mini-series, you'll not only enjoy the story but appreciate even more the terrific job Michelle Williams is doing as Gwen Verdon.
3 Comments
Douglass Abramson
4/26/2019 08:29:29 pm
Interesting that Douglas called the show a hit. Still playing on Broadway after a year, it would seem to be a valid description. But, the stories I read when the revival started tended to describe Chicago as a disappointment, if not an outright flop. Was this spin to make the revival look better than the original production, or was the Fosse version so expensive that it never made a lot of money no matter how many tickets it sold?
Reply
Robert Elisberg
4/26/2019 11:14:11 pm
I'm not sure who you read that said the original production of "Chicago" was a disappointment, let alone perhaps an outright flop, but they're out of their minds. It ran for almost 1,000 performances -- 936 -- which is nearly 2-1/2 years. It was a big hit. What its profit was, I have no idea. It was a big show, and the revival (which began life as a concert production at the Encores! series) was more barebones. But after 2-1/2 years -- plus a 600-performance run in London and the national tour -- I'm sure its profit was just fine. The only thing I ever heard was how unexpected it was that the revival ran longer than the original.
Reply
Douglass Abramson
4/26/2019 11:24:55 pm
Thanks. This far removed from the beginning of the revival I can't remember where I came across the erroneous information, but I'm fairly sure it was in print. Somebody must have gotten some bad background and the editor didn't catch it. With the original cast, the show being a hit makes more sense.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRobert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. Feedspot Badge of Honor
Archives
March 2025
Categories
All
|
© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
|