Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

ESPNew York

8/14/2015

3 Comments

 
This is a piece that deals a lot with baseball, so you have been duly noted.  In particular it's a rant about ESPN.

The inveterate Chris Dunn and I exchange emails about a wide range of subjects, but baseball is always high on the list.  Though a generally good soul, his most notable lapse is being a fan of the hated St. Louis Cardinals, but I can forgive him for it because he is impressionable about shiny objects.

The other day I sent him a note which, even though it was in defense of the Chicago Cubs, even he actually agreed with the point.The background is much too long to get into, but suffice it to say that ESPN has long had a gargantually clear New York bias.  Even their on-air commentators will periodically roll their eyes about it.  The bias is most-pronounced when they broadcast pretty much every game between the Yankees and Red Sox.  ("And in a programming note," I've heard ESPN commentators say, though I paraphrase.  "Tomorrow night we'll have the Yankees against the Boston Red Sox.  Well, there's a surprise.")  But if the Yankees aren't playing or a story that day, the Mets will do just fine.  Or any New York team whatever the sport or season.  New York is SO big, after all, SO many fans, and fans all over the country, that of course we have to cover them, all the time, with everything.  And because the city is so big, everyone cares about them, too, just as much, we know.  No one else seems to matter.

That's a story unto itself, but we'll leave it as background for now.  This is a more personal rant.  And to begin,  let's consider a few facts on the table.

Chicago is a pretty good-sized town.  In fact, it's the third largest city in the country.  Its metropolitan population is 9.7 million people.

Even with the second-smallest ballpark in the majors, and despite being perpetual losers and one of the worst teams in baseball for over a century, the Cubs still draw around 3 million fans a year at home.

When the Cubs travel across the country, attendance for their away games is the second-biggest of any MLB team, topped only by the Yankees.


The Cubs have not won a World Series in 106 years, but if the season ended today, the team would actually qualify for the playoffs.  Every time the Cubs have had that rare occurrence, and actually get into the post-season, the baseball world tends to get excited, wondering Could This Be The Year???!

No team in the history of baseball has ever made the post-season with three rookies in their regular starting lineup, and the Cubs are starting four rookies. It's been one of the most notable stories in baseball all season.

The Cubs haven't won 50% of the games in any of the past five years, and finished 74-89 last year, but  they have completely turned their team around and have the fourth best record in all of baseball this season.

Right now, the Cubs have won seven games in a row, and 13 of 14.  They have the hottest team in the National League.

Now, step back and imagine for a moment if this was the Yankees or Mets.  Imagine if they were the hottest team in their league, on a seven-game winning streak and had 13 wins in their last 14 games with one of the top stories in baseball, and not having made the playoffs in years, but now actually qualifying.  Imag...Well, actually we don't have to imagine.  A little over a week ago, the Mets swept a 4-game series against the Washington Nationals, were on a seven-game winning streak, and moved into qualifying position for the playoffs -- and they were the top story on Baseball Tonight -- understandably -- with an added five more minutes of analysis on how in the world the remarkable team was doing it this year.  I suspect that if their games weren’t covered first on Baseball Tonight and then followed up with five minutes of analysis afterwards, half the producers would have been fired.

Compare that to last night.  After continuing their winning streak on an exciting extra-inning home run in the 10th inning, Baseball Tonight didn’t cover the Cubs game until the show was half over, 30 minutes in.  But this isn't about one mere game.  Last week, when the Cubs were playing the San Francisco Giants, who I remind you are the defending World Series champions, and battling each other for the final Wild Card spot in the playoffs, and the Cubs swept them four games in a row, too -- not one of their games was even reported on until a half hour into ESPN's Baseball Tonight show, either. (In fact, almost amusingly, on one of those nights, ESPN covered the Phillies-Padres game covered before the Cubs-Giants.  The Phillies are in last place in their division, and the Padres in second-to-last place.)   Indeed, for the past two weeks, during this hot streak, it’s been the same.  Coverage of the Cubs has been buried in the middle of the broadcast, at best.


Honestly, admittedly biased as I am, I actually don’t expect the Cubs games to be the top story each night, even though we know they would be if it was a New York team.  (As I said, when the Mets swept the Nationals they were indeed the lead story each night.)  What I do expect at this point is that Cubs games -- most especially those against the defending World Series champs playing for the final Wild Card spot -- be covered at least most of the time before the first commercial break, or promoted to be the first story after returning from the ad.  Not consistently buried halfway through the show, night after night.  I don't think that's terribly unreasonable in the slightest, even with personal bias.

I really don’t understand it.  And what I don't understand isn't just because it's the Cubs.  I don’t understand it if this wasn't the Cubs but any team that had won seven games in a row, won 13 of 14 and had the fourth best record in all of baseball.  But I most especially don't understand it given those points above.  Yes, I completely, 100% understand and appreciate that this is of far more interest to Cubs fans (of whom, in fairness,  there are a WHOLE LOT), but I suspect that when any team has won 13 of 14, most baseball fans everywhere are at least interested.. because they are, in fact, baseball fans, and want to see coverage of the hottest teams with the best story -- whoever that team is -- and see it before coverage of two teams in the basement like the Phillies and Padres with a combined record of 100-128.

As much as one might think this is just about the Cubs, it isn't.  I'm taking the time to write it and at such length because, of course, it's the Cubs.  But this is as much about the egregious, almost laughably-blatant New York bias of ESPN, which I've talked about with others at length, even when a Chicago team wasn't remotely involved.  That it's reached such conspicuous levels the past week with the Cubs is what's inspired me to write -- but it's not what got me talking about it in the first place.  As I said, Chris Dunn and I have long made it a running joke about changing our appointment schedules because ESPN is broadcasting the Yankees-Red Sox.  Or Yankees anyone. Or the Mets Mets Mets.  Or KnicksGiantsYankeesMets.

To be fair, ESPN has highlighted the Toronto Blue Jays, who've now won 11 games in a row.  Not as their top story as should be the case, but they do get to them before the half hour.  Of course, it's worth adding that Toronto is in the same division as the Yankees and just overtook New York for first place.  And you wonder why they get highlighted??

And to be fair, it's not just ESPN, though they're the most consistently egregious.  But just tonight, the MLB Network listed two possible games they might be airing.  One was St. Louis and against Pittsburgh, teams with the first and third best records in ALL of baseball.  The other was last-place Cleveland against the second-place New York Yankees. I'll give you one second to think about what's on the air right now.  Correct -- New York and last-place Cleveland.  Huzzah!

To be fair, as well, perhaps the ESPN thinking is, "We want to hold off coverage of the Cubs to keep viewers watching."  The problem with that unlikely theory is that when the Yankees or Mets are doing well, they are the top story, pretty much 100% of the time, not held off five minutes, let alone a half hour to keep viewers watching.  And if you are holding off something to tease the audience...then you tease the audience.  You let them know something is coming later, so keep watching.  But there's been none of that.  So, that theory doesn't hold.

Which brings us back to, "I really don't understand it."  I've long since figured out their love of All Thing New York.  That's a given and obvious, at this point.  But burying the Chicago Cubs who haven't won a World Series in 106 years and are on a streak winning 13 of their last 14 games and are actually in position to qualify for the playoffs and have one of the biggest fan bases in all of sports...I don't understand it.


But then, I don't have to understand it.  In the end, I'm just glad that the Cubs have won more games than they've lost.  Huzzah!  I hope they keep it up.  I think their team is much too young to win the World Series this year, but who knows?  This could be the century.
3 Comments
GregVB
8/14/2015 06:36:19 am

Bob -- I was *afraid* you would mention that sweep... I thought of you when it occurred. I have also been very confused not only by ESPN, but CBS: during one of the commercial pauses during 60 Minutes, every week, they have a Sports Break. They NEVER mention Bay Area teams -- EVER! To your point (and I have noted it myself), the Giants are the friggin' World Champions! They are arguably close to dynastic, winning three out of the last five World Series! Not a peep -- EVER! Five Bay Area teams (six if you count that also-ran sport of ice hockey...). NUNCA! Not for baseball, not for football, not for basketball (need I note the Warriors' season)? NADA!

You're right about the population of Chicago, but we're no slackers: the Bay Area is about 8 million people! LA is much bigger, but look how great THEIR teams have been of late (crickets)! GRRRR! Rodney Dangerfield said it best....

Fingers crossed for your Cubbies (though I hope they don't continue embarrassing the Giants)!

Reply
Robert Elisberg
8/14/2015 07:18:50 am

Dr. Buzz, as I suspect you know, the problem that SF has -- and much of the West Coast -- is that their games tend to end long after people in the East (and even Midwest) have long-since gone to sleep. So, to programmers in the East, they don't count. Los Angeles does get mentioned because, well, it's the second biggest city in the U.S. But it's always been a problem with West Coast teams.

And you're right, the Giants have been close to having a dynasty, and the Warriors won the NBA championship.

But mainly, if you're not on the East Coast, it's hard to matter.

As for mentioning the sweep -- hey, when you haven't won in 106 years, you mention ANY victory...

Reply
Paul
8/14/2015 09:11:35 pm

As a wise man once said, "If it bothers you that much, you don't have to watch it!"
Personally, every ESPN anchor seems to try to emulate Chris Berman, and I didn't think he was that good.
I treat ESPN and FOX opinion the same, stations I click through on the way to the golf channel or the Waltons.
If you are looking for someone who shares your Cubbie boner, I would suggest WGN.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like