Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

Bambi Lives

3/8/2014

0 Comments

 
"When I started, I knew where Putin stood geopolitically, but did not know that his views would be imposed on the news operation."
-- Liz Wahl,  correspondent for the government-run network Russia Today, who quit on-air

Wait a minute, seriously, Ms. Wahl?  You were a news reporter for a one-party Russian government TV network, and you had no idea that the president of Russia, who is additionally a former KGB officer, would have his views imposed on the news operation???  Really?  You didn't know?  If you wrote game captions for My Weekly Reader, I'd think you know that.  But as a news reporter ("news"!), I'd have thought that knowing that was a basic given.  Sort of like a server at the We Only Serve Spaghetti chain of restaurants knows he'll be pushing spaghetti.

While I admire Liz Wahl's refusal to report stories that she felt were nothing more than government propaganda, I do question her abilities as a reporter.  I mean, honestly, how hard would it have been to do a little digging -- and by "little," I mean asking the person who'll be sitting in the c
ubicle next to you -- to find out how delivering the news in Russia over the one-party, government-owned TV network would work.

(Note: so as not to be confused, Liz
Wahl is not the same person as the on-air host at the same RT network who a few days before had criticized the Russian government's actions in the Ukraine.  That was Abby Martin, who among others things is a 9/11 "Truther," and who I've heard described as a perpetual conspiratorialist along the lines of Orly Taitz. Both she and Liz Wahl, it should be mentioned, are American citizens.)

It's important to note, as well -- for both of these incidents -- that the Russia Today network is not broadcast in Russia.  It's an English-language network broadcast outside the country to the rest of the world.  So, as high profile as both acts of dissension have been in the U.S., no one in Russia was tainted by actually having to see any of this.  That doesn't diminish in the slightest what they said, it just meant to put it in geographical perspective.

After Liz Wahl quit on the air, among other things that she said about the RT network in an interview with The Daily Beast was, "In order to succeed there you don’t question. It’s not a sound news organization, not when your agenda is making America look bad."

It's a reasonable, valid statement for her to make.  No quibbles there about the substance of her words at all.  I'm just wondering why on earth she doesn't appear to have been aware of that beforehand.
  She was a news correspondent, after all.  I'm guessing she could read.  I'm guessing she...well, was interested in the news.

It is not surprising to hear that officials at the RT network dismissed her quitting on air as a "Self-promotional stunt."

The thing is, though, I think I agree with them. To be clear, agreeing that it was a self-promotional stunt doesn't lessen the spot-on accuracy of her charges.  But the more I look at this -- her shock and outrage that a state-owned Russian TV news organization doesn't have open, objective, sound news, but delivers what the Russian president wants, and you don't question that the one-party government's agenda is anti-American -- the more in the back of my head I hear the police constable in Casablanca, Louis, say when raiding a well-known gin joint, "I'm shocked, shocked that gambling is going on here!" -- before picking up his own gambling winnings.  What Ms. Wahl's hurt, disappointed, shocked "amazement" seems to me to be is that, in fact, she was very intentionally auditioning for a job on U.S. television, and this was the best way to bring attention to herself.

To be clear, I certainly agree with the substance of what she said.  And I think it took a bit of impressive swagger to say so and quit on the air.  But if I was one of those "sound news organizations" she says she admires, and I was looking to hire a reporter with crack analytical skills and insight, I might think twice about going with Liz Wahl
-- at least without doing more due diligence than she apparently did.  After all, she's either the most naive correspondent in the world, or the most disingenuous and untrustworthy.  Neither a good thing for a reporter who's supposed to see through deception and deliver the truth. 

Will she end up on the air with a U.S broadcasting job?  We'll find out.  Perhaps on a local station, though I suspect she's going for The Big Picture, and a national platform.  The problem is that I wouldn't expect to see her end up on CNN or MSNBC, since for all her admirable outspokenness, she does seem to present on the surface a great deal more innocent, trusting Bambi-like credulity than one tends to require in a serious investigating reporter.  But there's an even far bigger problem for getting hired by Fox.  Not that her anti-Russian statements wouldn't be most-especially celebrated there, nor that they likely would admire how she doesn't seem to look to deeply into the the organization where she's applying to work.  But rather, she said that she specifically was looking for a "sound news organization,"  whose agenda wasn't being imposed by the person who runs it in an effort to makes opposing political views look bad.

I think that Liz Wahl did a very interesting thing quitting on air for the reasons she did.  I'd just admired her more if she'd been more honest (or less bizarrely naive) about
where it was she worked.  The reality is, I suspect she's not that naive.  (At least I hope not, most especially for a news reporter...)  Because that would be scary-naive, the kind of wide-eyed innocence that should require a person to walk around with a protective crash helmet on her head 24/7 for personal safety.  So, if not, then be upfront that you took the job because you wanted to speak to a world audience and gain experience and hope maybe, possibly you could get some outside perspective reported on occasion.  But as uphill and difficult as you knew it might be, you just never got the chance to do it right.  And this is the last straw, and so you quit.  If you'd had been honest like that, what's the worst they would they have done?  Fire you?  Hey, you just quit!

But if she is that innocent -- and while I don't think so, I don't remotely put it out of the realm of possibility and will accept taking her at her word -- please, dear God, somebody rent her Casablanca. 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Available on Amazon

    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2025
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like