Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

April Fool: Osage County

12/19/2013

2 Comments

 
One of the movies I was most looking forward to this season was August: Osage County.  I'd seen the stage play, which began life at the Steppenwolf Theater in Chicago, and loved it.  It won the Tony Award as Best Play and also the Pulitzer Prize.  And the film had a great cast.  But when I saw it last week, I was quite disappointed.

Mind you, it was well-acted, smartly written (adapted by playwright Tracy Letts) and solidly-directed with much texture.  But it was off.  Much I ascribed to it clearly being truncated.  I didn't remember exactly how long the stage play was, but I've been telling people that at least 20 minutes were cut out, which is a huge amount.  In the back of my mind, though, I thought more was -- I remember the play being wonderful, but seriously long.  Like around three hours with intermission.  But because I didn't remember exactly, I wanted to be fair to the movie.  Only a few times did I tell people that maybe as much as a half hour had been cut.

I couldn't tell you exactly what was shorter, though the sense I have is that the men's roles were greatly trimmed, and connective plot lines and relationships were lost.  Revelations in the stage play were admittedly a bit soap opera-ish at times, but they at least came from the structure and felt
largely natural, not coming totally out of nowhere.  In the film, they sort of leap out.

I also felt that as good as the acting was, it seemed wrong, much too over the top, chew-the-scenery, operatic.  The problem I had with the movie was that it was trying to be a Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, a searing family drama battle, when it didn't have the initial structure to support that -- on stage it was doing something else entirely, as much a comedy as powerful drama.  The slyness and wit on stage slowly weaved its way around you and built up its power.  The matriarch wasn't a Lady Macbeth harridan, but a sly, wistful drunk, who ruled by deep manipulation,

But mainly, the problem I had with the movie was that too much had been cut, I And so, I've kept telling people that the play was much longer, 20 minutes longer, maybe even 30 minutes.

It turns out that it’s worse than I thought.

I was trading emails with a friend back east who loves the theater though hadn't seen the stage play and was much looking forward to the movie.  I didn't want to give too much away, so I was dancing around the corners.  He finally saw the movie yesterday, and wrote to me --

"It seemed like a disjointed, misguided attempt to 'open up and condense what probably worked a lot better on stage.  There are some explosively funny Albee-esque sequences of familial violence, and some ridiculous soap opera 'revelations."  And then he added, "I feel like I was watching highlights of the play, with material that would amplify the characters excised.  I'm sorry I missed the play because this is a completely false representation of what that experience must have been like."

I wrote him back that the opening up the play very slightly didn't bother me, but that it was indeed disjointed and condensed.  And to really solidify that point, I decided to do some research.

Now, again, my memory was that the play was very long, but as I said I didn’t remember its run-time exactly so I always wanted to be fair to the movie, and always was erring on the short side.  Only once did I risk mentioning that I thought it might even possibly be closer to three hours with intermission.  I just looked it up online.  And it turns out to be worse than I thought:

First, I thought the running time for the movie was 130 minutes.  It turns out to be only 121 minutes, but that's with end credits.  So, it's actually only about 1:55.  Fifteen minutes shorter than I thought.

And second, for
the write-up on the play, there’s this quote –

"In 2009, Entertainment Weekly put it on its end-of-the-decade, 'best-of'' list, saying, 'Even with a run time of three and a half hours, Tracy Letts' 2007 drama...'"

Three-and-a-half hours!!.  Hey, at least I did keep insisting that the play was extremely long!

Now, to be fair, that was with two intermissions.  (Yes, two, that's how long the play is!).  So, that means the play runs for three hours.  That means they cut an hour and a quarter out of the play!  That’s almost 40% of it!! 

So it turns out that my friend actually did see highlights of it.

And that's why I was complaining about the movie trying to be Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, but not having the structure of being able to maintain that.  Imagine seeing “Virginia Woolf” with 40% out.  Imagine seeing almost anything with 40% cut out.

(By the way, I can see Julia Roberts wanting to chew up the scenery, to make her more-supporting character be More Important.  But I kept being shocked all the way through that Meryl Streep chose to do that.  I guess she felt if that’s what the director wants, it’s for me to give it to him.  Because I’m sure she saw the play and knows what it is, and how that role is supposed to be played.  At least in the three-hour version...)

Can you imagine?  They cut out over an hour.  Sheesh, I knew it had been long…

Even though Tracy Letts did his own adaptation, I don't want to blame him for the
adaptation.  Clearly he did the work here.  But just as clearly, he knows how to get it right, because he did so on stage.  I suspect the film company didn’t want to release a 150 minute movie and insisted it be no more than 120 minutes, and also felt that audiences would be lost not knowing if it was supposed to be a drama or funny, and directly John Wells wanted to direct an Important Movie, and that means “serious,” and Letts got his marching orders what to do, and he did the best he could.  I can’t imagine a writer changing his own work this much because he wanted to, because he thought he didn’t get it right when he won the Tony and Pulitzer.

I don’t dislike the movie.  I just don’t think it’s terribly involving.  What I dislike is that it got changed so drastically much from the wonderful play. They could have made a landmark film.  In the end, why make a movie of August: Osage County if you have no intention of making August: Osage County?

But let's go a step further.  Let's hear what someone else has to say, like...oh, Meryl Streep, who stars in the film as Violet, the matriarch.

"It retains something of the original," she told a reporter about the film version.  A film version, to be clear, of the Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award-winning play! 

If this had retained
"most of the original" that would would have been bad enough.  "Much of the original" would have been awful.  But..."It retains something of the original" is -- while accurate -- a woefully misguided way to adapt a Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning play.  What were they thinking??  What movie were they trying to make? 

Stranger still is an interview that author Tracy Letts
did with Huffington Post Entertainment.  The interviewer says, "
The film is an almost to-the-letter adaptation of your play, but there are some changes."

Say, what???  In what nonsensical universe is that reporter living in?  It's not close to an "almost to-the-letter adaptation" -- unless your definition of "almost" is "missed by an inch, missed by a mile.
"

Mind you, the funniest thing in the interview is the editorial comment
at the end -- "This interview has been edited and condensed." 

Don't tell me God doesn't have a sense of humor.


If you have interest in seeing the movie, there's plenty enough to enjoy.  But just know it will likely seem disjointed and truncated.  And know that you aren't seeing August: Osage Country.  You are seeing an intelligent, highly-professional, deeply unfortunate movie adaptation of a wonderful play.  That retains something of the original.



2 Comments
Douglass Abramson
12/19/2013 10:32:18 am

Thanks for saving me an admission.

Reply
Robert Elisberg
12/19/2013 03:02:37 pm

It's worth seeing on DVD -- and for some, it'll be worth seeing on the big screen. But I do feel it's important that people are aware that they're *not* seeing what was on stage and won the Pulitzer Prize.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.



    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Tech
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2023
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like