Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

An Incentive to Respond

12/6/2016

0 Comments

 
A friend wrote to me about a Letter to the Editor that had appeared in the Los Angeles Times over the weekend, on Sunday.  She wanted to know how I would reply.  

What the original letter said was -


"To the editor: Right on the front page, there was article about the cost of tax breaks and giveaways Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence had to give to Carrier to keep about 1,000 jobs in the U.S. The people quoted in the article said those giveaways will be used as leverage by other companies to get incentives from the Trump administration.

"OK, fine. But in the same day’s Business section, there was an article on California providing tax breaks to film companies that return to or decide not to move out of the state. People interviewed said it was a good thing and helped our economy. 

"Why was it a bad thing for Trump to do and good thing for California? The bias of The Times is really starting to wear thin. ​

​I wasn't in a mood to sit down and craft a response, but jotted down some immediate thoughts.  What I wrote back to my friend was -- 

I would say that the letter-writer is conflating two separate issues.  One tax incentive is a pay-off to a single company.  The other involves an industry that is one of the foundations of the Southern California economy, which doesn’t only help any direct company involved, but all the supporting businesses that are impacted by having a vibrant film industry and all the related business of a movie community in Los Angeles – not just the studios and production companies receiving any incentives, but production rental companies, supply houses, screening rooms, property and wardrobe houses, individual actors and craft artists and technicians, talent agencies, casting agencies, craft unions, hotels, restaurants, ad agencies, florists, caterers and on and on and on.  There are many other air conditioner manufacturers besides Carrier around the country, not something indigenous to Indiana.  The movie industry is foundational to Los Angeles.  When you give incentives to Carrier, there are side benefits to the area but it is Carrier that most profits.  When you give incentives to film companies, it is the related-industry and the entire surrounding community that perhaps even most benefits.

Additionally, the two situations being addressed are totally different and therefore dealt with differently.  In the case of Carrier, it was likely that the cost of doing business is more expensive in the U.S., compared to a foreign country, which is a fundamental problem not changed in the slightest by a tax incentive payoff.  The basic problem still exists, which in turn then opens the door to all other business anywhere in the country threatening to move unless paid-off.  With movies and TV, however, the costs of making their product often are generally the same wherever produced, but other areas provide tax incentives that make filming less expensive.  So, changing tax incentives does tend to change conditions by equalizing the playing field.  Furthermore, with a company like Carrier, they could conceivably stay in Indiana to make the product, though it would cost more.  That might price it out of the market, but the point is it could be made.  With a TV series or movie, however, if the bottomline costs are too high to produce (including the cost of hiring "above-the-line" actors and filmmakers)…then it simply wouldn’t be made, period.  When a budget is too high for a TV series or movie, the jobs aren’t “shipped to Mexico" or elsewhere, the production simply doesn’t get done.  And there’s no way to jack-up the price on the back end to recoup the cost – you can’t charge the public more for watching a TV series or raise ticket prices for one specific film at a movie theater, the ticket price is basically set until general inflation kicks in.  
 
Also, often in the case of Hollywood, though not always, it’s NOT that the jobs were being moved to another country (which is the big patriotic argument we hear), but often just to another state, so the work was being kept right here in America.  Patriotism or even xenophobia is not a factor.  And in the case of movie companies, unlike Carrier closing down a division and moving its factory and jobs elsewhere, or even a company that moves itself entirely out of the country, it is most likely that the studio or company doesn't change one iota but just that an individual film or series was to be shot elsewhere, which is far more a temporary occurrence, perhaps even only a one-time issue. 
 
It's also important to look at what the specific tax incentives were in both cases, not only how they are applied, but also the amounts being given ($7 million in Carrier’s case), which might make the differences even much more significant and impactful. 
 
Among other things, too, the payoff to Carrier didn’t, in fact, keep The Jobs in the U.S.  It allowed the company to still ship 700 jobs out of the country.  And the head of the parent company, Ben Hayes, appeared on CNBC yesterday to explain that many of the jobs that remained in the U.S. would likely still be lost soon enough, not because of moving anyway, but due to efficiency through automation.  Making movies and TV, and all the related business that fuel the Industry, still tend to rely on people.
 
There’s another difference, as well: one of perception, which is always critical.  Trump initially told the world that he convinced Carrier to stay, as if his personal aura and power and argument was the cause of it all.  It turned out to be a lie, and that is part of the resulting negative reaction.  Further still, in making a payoff he and Mike Pence did what Trump especially so vociferously and Republicans in general have long-chastised President Obama and Democrats for -- the bail-out of the auto industry and of banks, stimulus packages to the economy and general opposition of any sort of bail out or welfare, yet turn out to be fine with all other manner of corporate tax incentives and such which are bailouts by any other name -- so it’s the hypocrisy, as well, that is driving the critical reactions.
 
In the end, if I lived solely in a Twitteresque world which seems to be the sort of prompt behind the question at hand, and I had to use just 140 charecters to address the criticism raised, I would say that the letter writer is overly simplifying an issue without knowing how the businesses actually work or how the incentives were made.

Which is the sort of thinking that ultimately brings us a Trump as President-Elect.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.



    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Busienss
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2023
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like