top of page
2111754655.jpg

Updated: Jul 17

Yesterday, Trump not only said that we supposedly control the Strait of Hormuz – but also he’s going to charge tankers 20%!!!!  This comes, of course, after all the outrage at the idea of Iran charging a toll, since (as the outrage went) these are free and open waters, and no one should be charging a toll.  And now Trump says he wants to charge 20%!!! 


But that’s only the first and second level of stupidity.  (The first being that he thinks we “control” the Strait of Homuz, since that didn’t work the first time he trotted that idea.  While it’s a great concept if this was as recent as five years ago when mines could block a strait, but cleared by experts, drones now actually exist.  And Iran has shown it has the capability to use them to bomb tankers.)


Even more stupid is that with a 20% charge to oil tankers, that can only serve to ensure the price of gas will be higher at the pump than it would otherwise.  Quite the concept anytime, but especially in an election year.  And especially coming from the guy who said “affordability” was a hoax, a made up word.  And who said, when asked if he thought about Americans’ financial situation when negotiating with Iran, answered, “Not even a little bit.”  And who refused to sign the bipartisan bill to lower housing costs. 


And even still more still is that it’s so unnecessary, since it’s hard to imagine many tankers even trying to get through the Strait of Homuz – even for free -- before there’s a signed peace treaty, even for free, since (with the continued threat of drone attacks) insurance companies wouldn’t insure them.  The issue, of course, isn’t the United States “controlling” the Strait, but that Iran has drones that can attack tankers.


When discussing this on MSNOW yesterday, former Lt. General Mark Hertling said that Trump is now at the point “of what the military calls ‘Mission Creep.’”  When they cut back to the roundtable discussion, Eddie Glaude said, “Let me translate what General Hertling was saying into everyday English.  He was saying that Trump doesn’t have any idea what he’s doing.”


And of course, bombing has begun again in Iran – after Trump has sent out his triumphant tweet about how there was a ceasefire, the war was over, the Strait of Hormuz was open and “Let the oil flow!” 


The price of gas is up, by the way.


 Trump was asked yesterday by Kaitlin Collins with CNN, “You’ve been bombing Iran for four months now. If this just the new normal for the American people?”  His response was, “Well, you know we were in Vietnam for 19 years.  We’re here for four months.”


That would be, more accurately, “still here” and still bombing.  Which avoids the question, of course.  Because he doesn’t have a clue what he’s doing or how to end this idiotic war he started for no reason, after tearing up a treaty.


I suspect that “We’re here for four months” and comparing your war to Vietnam is not the answer most MAGOP party leaders wanted to hear going into a General Election.  Nor do most Americans.


I also suspect that just because Trump says he's going to do all this doesn't mean he will.  After all, among many other things, we're still waiting for the wall Trump said 10 years ago he was going to build and that Mexico would be paying for.  But this sends such a horrible message to the world on what other countries should do about their own actual waterways.  But then, sending horrible messages seems to be Trump's stock in trade.


All this aside (and you'd need more bulldozers than are at work destroying the East Wing of the White House to push this all aside), your reminder that the Strait of Hormuz was open before and free before Trump chose to attack Iran.  After he tore up the treaty we had with them.  And that his stated reason for going to war with Iran was to get rid of their nuclear material -- which he'd said just months before he had "obliterated".  Though he now says Iran's nuclear material still exists, but is “so far down underground, I don't care about that.”   Which says there was no reason for attacking Iran.


Which explains what the military means when it says you have “Mission Creep”. 


And even more, when it’s being run by the biggest creep of all.

 
 

If you didn't see Jon Stewart's Monday hosting of The Daily Show last night, he Main Story was on the age of so many members of Congress.  And he did what would almost seem impossible, he made the death of Lindsey Graham hilarious without being disrespectful or even critical of Graham.  How we managed that is a masterclass in comedy.  



 
 

Updated: Jul 17

The other month, I posted a video here of Stephen Colbert having his Strike Force 5 partners on as guests for one of his final shows.  Those are the five late night hosts (Colbert, along with Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, John Oliver and Jimmy Fallon) who got together for 12 podcasts during the last Writers Guild strike.  The podcasts were wildly entertaining and a joy, as the clearly close-friendship between competitors and seeing these comedians ragging on one another burst out each week.  And their appearance on his late night now for a sort of joint-interview was a great treat.


As it happens, they got together one more time for a final Strike Force 5, as a sort of farewell to Stephen Colbert.  It wasn’t done exactly the same – rather than each at home and audio only, this was the five guys sitting at a conference table and all on video.  It starts off a bit rambling, but eventually kicks with the same spirit and humor.


But it’s at its best (for me) when they bring back their most famous and popular episode.  Episode 5.  That was when Jimmy Fallon was the week’s host, and decided to do a “Newlywed Show”-type game and contacted each of the others’ wives beforehand to ask them questions that their husband’s would then have to match.  But he screwed it up so badly, that they mercilessly shredded him throughout the episode – and for the rest of the podcasts, including “Part 2” of the game because Fallon hadn’t gotten to all his questions.  And even on their joint-Colbert appearance.  And here, when they insisting on Fallon again contacting the wives.  This goes better, but there are still plenty enough mess-ups.  It starts around the 35:00 mark.


Slight digression, but it’s related.


When tracking this down, I found a video of Seth Meyers doing a Q&A with his audience, and he’s asked his favorite Strike Force 5 episode, and without literally a second of hesitation, says it was that “Episode 5” that Jimmy Fallon hosted.  And he explains why.  Here’s that minute clip –




(By the way, if you want hear that "Strike Force Wives" episode -- and it is really wonderfully funny -- my article about it and a link is here.)


But the reason I bring it up is that in the User Comments on YouTube, someone (going by the name “Moorebid_) trying to be oh-so All Knowing tries to come to Fallon’s defense and says, “


“To be fair to Fallon, there was a writer's strike going at the time, so he wasn't allowed to write his questions down; the fact that he wrote anything at all (even something as simple as "pet name?") technically makes him a scab.” 


I never respond to User Comments online.  (I’ve only done so three times, I think, and those only because I was directly involved in some way – once was when a friend was wrongly trashed – and what was said was completely wrong.)  And I so badly wanted to respond there, because the All-Knowing person was oh-so completely wrong.  But I put aside my anxiousness to jump in and left it without replying.  But that was there, and this is here, so I can post here what I wanted to say there –


“As a member of the Writers Guild who was on strike, this comment is completely wrong.  The Writers Guild was on strike against companies who are signatories to the Minimum Basic Agreement.  Non-fiction podcasts, like Strike Force 5 with people just sitting around talking to one another, are not covered by the MBA.  Nor is writing emails to the wives of friends.  Not only was Jimmy Fallon not "technically” a scab, he was nor a scab in any way, shape or form.  He was absolutely, 100% allowed to write his questions down for the podcast.”


Good, I got that out of my system.  And now on to the final Strike Force 5 podcast.  Unless they decide to do another


 


 
 
Illustration of a waiter carrying a covered serving dish
316854.jpg

This site is an Amazon Affiliate and gets a small commission if you click this button or any product link before shopping on Amazon.

  • Facebook
  • X

To make a comment, click on an article's title.  A comment box will be at the bottom of the page.

Author

Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, has two sort-of best-selling novels, and was a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he's had a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

Feedspot Top 100 Funny Blog award badge

Feedspot Badge of Honor

bottom of page