Elisberg Industries
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like
Decent Quality Since 1847

The Kavanaugh Conundrum

9/13/2018

0 Comments

 
There's been one particular oddity about the fight over Brett Kavanaugh's nomination for the Supreme Court.  It's surprised me a bit on its own merits, but also since I haven't heard it discussed in the media ever since the nomination was made.  (That doesn't mean it hasn't been, just that I haven't heard it...)

From the first, Republicans knew that this would be a deeply controversial fight.  Even Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Trump he should nominate someone other than Kavanaugh.  When the Federalist Society gave Trump their list of five "approved" nominees (which is another matter all its own...), Kavanaugh was on it, but at the very bottom.  But that's who Trump nominated -- for the reason most people all presume, that Kavanaugh is seemingly against the legality of indicting a sitting president.  And so Republicans were stuck with this fight.

And not just a fight, but a bitter fight that made them look small and corrupt, hiding tens of thousands of pages of documents.  Defending a perjurer.  Defending someone whose position on abortion may cause massive problems for Republicans in upcoming state elections.  (Keep in mind that about 80% of women are against overturning Roe v. Wade.)  And perhaps cause problems even for the senators themselves.  Defending someone whose presence on the Supreme Court will always be a target for opponents and a reminder of these senators' egregious actions and which could be held against them when the tables are turned and Democrats are in control in the Senate and White House.  And all over a nominee who is at risk of being impeached for his perjury when Democrats are next in control.

And all for a "fight" that has little meaning for them.

Consider:

This nomination isn't like an election where, if you lose, then your opponent wins.  This is just a nomination.  And if for some reason Brett Kavanaugh is voted down (unlikely, I know, but it's always been possible), then it's not like Republicans lost the seat on the bench.  Trump will just nominate someone else -- and someone who is just as deeply conservative.  In fact, probably the first choice on the Federalist Society's list.

And that's the oddity.

Unlike most fights, this was a no-lose situation for the Republican Party.  Not for Trump precisely -- we can figure out one big reason he nominated Mr. Kavanaugh.  And while that's probably a matter of some concern to Republican Senators, it's far less so that for the potential indictee in the Oval Office.  The main thing Republican senators care about is having a very conservative justice sitting on the Supreme Court with a lifetime appointment.

If at the very beginning of this nomination process Republican leadership very quietly behind the scenes told Trump not just that they preferred a different candidate (which Mitch McConnell did do), but far more forcefully made abundantly clear that they would be releasing all of the requested documents as requires, and that leadership would give their members the opportunity to vote their conscience, that GOP senators didn't have to be lock-step with one another, and they wouldn't have their careers tied to a deeply-flawed, problematic nominee, one with an exceedingly-negative approval by the public, then it might have been so obvious from the very first that Brett Kavanaugh would have no chance of getting confirmed, and he might have withdrawn his name, or Trump might not have made the nomination in the first place. And if that happened, Republicans wouldn't have "lost" anything -- because it all would have been immediately followed by a new nominee just as conservative as Kavanaugh.  And one without all the "perjury-abortion-blocked documents" baggage, one who wouldn't burden the senators' own careers, one would wouldn't be at risk of being impeached and losing the seat -- and one who would sail through the nomination process and bring Trump and the GOP a semblance of acclaim for just a fine jurist.

But instead, Republicans chose to fight this battle.  Over a nominee who will forever color them and the party.  They chose, as they always have, to cave in to Trump, to their own almost-inexplicable detriment.  For pretty much no reason at all, because the next nominee would have been just as conservative, and perhaps even admired.  It was like putting all their chips on the table and going all-in for Harriet Miers or Alberto Gonzales -- or even Clement Haynsworth or G. Harrold Carswell, all of whom were considered for the Supreme Court but never got there.

At a certain point, this withdrawal scenario ceased being viable.  If Kavanaugh's name was removed, it would have pushed the process too far back and risked the next nominee being voted on by a remotely-possible Democratic Senate.  So, I understand why they're fighting for him now.  But at the start??  They could have had their cake and not only eaten it, but gotten an extra slice with a butter-cream rosette on top.

So, once again, this Kavanaugh nomination is not about Trump.  We know who he is, we know why he nominated Brett Kavanaugh.  Once again, this is all about the elected officials of the Republican Party.  They could have avoided this all -- and easily.  And benefited.  But once again, they caved to Trump and acquiesced to their lowest instincts to allow the disaster of a nominee to head towards a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.

​This is about the Republican Party.  Again.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Elisberg Industries gets a commission if you click here before shopping on Amazon.
    Picture
    Follow @relisberg

    Author

    Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

    Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, and two best-selling novels, is a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and was for
    the Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he has a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.



    Picture
           Feedspot Badge of Honor

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All
    Animals
    Audio
    Audio Land
    Books
    Busienss
    Business
    Chicago
    Consumer Product
    Education
    Email Interview
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Fine Art
    Food
    From The Management
    Health
    History
    Huffery
    Humor
    International
    Internet
    Journalism
    Law
    Los Angeles
    Media
    Morning News Round Up
    Movies
    Music
    Musical
    Personal
    Photograph
    Piano Puzzler
    Politics
    Popular Culture
    Profiles
    Quote Of The Day
    Radio
    Religion
    Restaurants
    Science
    Sports
    Technology
    Tech Tip
    Theater
    The Writers Workbench
    Tidbits
    Travel
    Tv
    Twitter
    Video
    Videology
    Well Worth Reading
    Words-o-wisdom
    Writing

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Robert J. Elisberg 2023
Contact Us    About EI    Chicago Cubs
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Products
    • Books
    • Movies
  • About Elisberg Industries
    • Our Corporate Board
    • Information Overstock
    • Elisberg Industries Entertainment Information
    • Elisberg Statistical Center of American Research
    • Consultancy Service
  • Contact
    • How to Find Us
  • Kudos
  • Good Things to Know
    • The BOB Page
    • Sites You Might Actually Like