top of page
2111754655.jpg

There are a few road markers along the way which help show the trouble Republicans face as they travel the highway towards the mid-term elections.  One, for example, was the 36-point turnaround for Democrats in the recent Ohio-12th Congressional race.  It doesn't matter who ends up winning that once-incredibly safe GOP seat now in a recount (and which will have another election in two months) -- what the warning sign said is that almost no seat is safe for Republicans and they have to spend their resources where they didn't expect to.


Another road marker popped up yesterday when its results were announced.  And the most important news in the poll was not about Trump.  It was about some under-the-wire details.


First, most notable, was the answer to the question about approval ratings for specific issues.  And it showed that Obamacare had a 51% approval, even with all the efforts by Trump to dismantle it.  But even more importantly -- not just for the pure number alone, but most especially for its comparison to the Obamacare approval and perspective -- is that public approval of the Trump tax cuts was only 40%!


It's pretty difficult to imagine any tax cuts only having a 40% approval, but far worse when it's that much behind health care which Trump has been slamming since before even being elected.


And second, was a poll result that showed 58% of Americans were in favor of a path to citizenship for immigrants currently living in the U.S. illegally.  Only 32% were against things.


Oh, and I left out one of the most important facts about this poll.  Who it's from.  No, this isn't a poll fro a some under-the-wire, left leaning organization.  This is from a "Fox News" Poll.  You can read the full results here.


There are a lot of other results in the poll, but those three are the "road markers" to me that speak loudly in their importance.  That's because they take away from Republicans probably the two issues they were most-expecting to campaign on campaign on in the mid-terms.


There hasn't been a great deal good in the news for Republican candidates to point to in their campaigning.  Standing by Trump might be a great issue in a GOP primary, but not a general election.  But bringing you the Trump tax cuts, "repealing-and-replacing" that awful Obamacare, and immigration protection to Keep You Safe are the three gems they certainly must have thought they had. 


And now -- whammo.


It's pretty hard to run on the great tax cuts when only 40% of the public likes them.  It's pretty hard to run on working to dismantle and repeal healthcare when a majority of Americans want it.  And it's pretty hard to run against immigration when the public is for it by a margin of 2-to-1.


And again, remember, this is from a "Fox News" polls.  It's easy to figure that this don't skew liberal.


On the "Fox News" website, people there were outraged, as you might imagine.  But this wasn't an opinion piece, this was pure numbers.  Nothing more than data.  Actual facts, not "alternative" ones.


To be clear, none of this is proof of anything.  And there is much more involved in getting a sense of how the mid-term elections will turn out.  It's just some more road signs.  But when you see a lot of yellow caution lights, it's a good idea to slow down and look around, rather than keep driving fast off the cliff.



 
 

Updated: Jul 17

In what has been for most of the coverage a convoluted issue, I have some very basic, starting thoughts on the latest accusation against Graham Platner, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate from Maine.


1. I have no idea what the truth is, but I think that any such accusation by any woman against anyone should be taken seriously and investigated.


2. As a local election, the public in Maine alone will decide whether or not to vote for him, if he decides to stay in the race.


3.  Whatever the discussion, whatever the opinions, I don’t want to hear one word of “outrage” by MAGOPS about it.  We will, of course, this is the MAGOP.  But I don’t want to hear it.  Nor should anyone.  A woman testified under oath that Trump raped her, and he was adjudicated twice by a jury, and MAGOPs were perfectly okay with that and voted for him to be president.  A woman testified under oath that Brett Kavanaugh raped her, and MAGOPs were perfectly okay with that and not only supported his nomination to a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court but their senators voted to confirm him.  And a dozen women claimed Trump sexually assaulted them – and MAGOPs as a united party dismissed them all out of hand, and voted twice for Trump to be president.  So, any “outrage” by MAGOPs – no matter what the outcome of the situation is with Graham Platner – is meaningless and just empty, outlandish hypocrisy in its purest form.  In fact, the only impact MAGOP “outrage” here has is to draw attention to the fact that a woman testified under oath that Trump raped her, for which he was twice adjudicated by a jury.  And that a woman testified under oath that Brett Kavanaugh raped her, and MAGOP senators voted to confirm him to the Supreme Court.  And 12 women publicly stated that Trump sexually assaulted them, and MAGOPs voted for him to be president, twice.  So, as the expression goes – sit this one out.  This is for others to deal with.  MAGOPs are disqualified on the issue and lost their right to that long ago, and lost it repeatedly.


And one other reason MAGOPs should sit out voicing any hypocritical “outrage”.  The Maine Democratic Party has called on Graham Platner to drop out of the race.  Numerous Democratic senators have withdrawn their endorsements.  And it appears that the Democratic Party overall is putting pressure on Platner to quit the race.  The same as Democrats did when accusations were made against Rep. Eric Swalwell who had been leading in his race to be the Democratic nominee for governor of California.  Contrast that with the zero number of MAGOP officials and national MAGOP party itself who called on Trump to resign as the party’s nominee when he had been literally adjudicated twice for what the judge said was the equivalence of rape.  And the zero MAGOP senators who voted against confirming Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, despite a woman testifying under oath that he had raped her.  Zero.  Nada.  None.  So, again, sit this one out, MAGOPs.  Save your “outrage” for a rainy day.  Your “outrage” only shines an eye-pummeling, bright light on your profound hypocrisy regularly supporting sexual abuse.


My opinion doesn’t matter here.  But I suspect that Graham Platner will drop out. He’s lost many endorsements already, and this might be one scandal too many, especially since the accusation here is more detailed than most.  I don’t know the truth, though, and this is no more than a guess.  So, for all I know, he’ll stay in the race. 


But if he does drop out, it’s not clear to me how Maine would select a replacement candidate.  But since it’s still four months before the General Election the Maine Democratic Party has at least some wiggle room.  But it’s an uphill situation.  That said, not knowing who the candidate would be -- let alone the process, the most likely options seeming to be a "pop-up" convention in a couple weeks or a statewide caucus -- there is also the question on how unpopular incumbent Susan Collins is.  And for all we know, enough Mainers would be happy to vote for any respectable Democrat rather than Collins.


So, if Graham Platner does drop out, the Maine Senate race can’t be written off – though it’s on life support.  And conventional wisdom has been that without Maine, Democrats won't be able to flip the four seats they need to take control of the Senate.  So, MAGOPs are likely celebrating.  But – I’m not sure if the conventional wisdom is true.


I think Democrats will flip North Carolina with the state’s popular, one-time governor Roy Cooper.  Ohio is tight, rated a toss-up, however Sherrod Brown has a strong chance to flip the seat, bringing a great deal of credibility as a “former” three-time senator in this anti-incumbent year -- especially when his incumbent opponent was never elected, but only appointed to his seat, and is tied to his party leader with a 34% approval.  And right now, James Talarico is actually tied in Red Texas (and polls show his supporters are far more “extremely motivated” than his MAGOP opponent.).  Further, in Red Iowa, Democrat Josh Turek very surprisingly has a lead in the polls.  So, that’s the four they need.  But even if one of those falls through, lest it be overlooked, Democrat Mary Peltola in Alaska is down by just two points in a July poll – though up by five points in a different poll taken in June, running against a MAGOP incumbent Dan Sullivan who has one of the lowest approvals in the Senate, just 39%.  And the race made even more difficult for him with an Independent candidate also on the ballot named...Dan Sullivan!  Which together makes five highly possible flips.


So, even without Maine, Democrats still have a serious possibility to take control of the Senate.  They need to hold all their own seats, the most at-risk being Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia, but he’s up by 13 points in a July Fox poll.  And holding Michigan could be tight, with Sen. Gary Peters retiring, but right now, before their primary, the leading Democrat has a solid lead against the MAGOP nominee.


And at this point, who knows what will happen in Maine?  But unexpectedly, Democrats have a path to win the Senate regardless of what occurs there.


Democrats have a record that that consideration doesn’t always hold much weight.  (Add in them pushing out Sen. Al Franken for using bad judgement when taking a raunchy joke-photo years before he was in the Senate.  And for that matter, putting pressure on President Biden to drop out when he showed cognitive decline.)  Whether they do take control of the Senate – whatever happens in Maine, when Graham Platner drops out…or doesn’t – the future will hold.


For now, I just hope MAGOPs stay out of crying “outrage” over something they don’t care about.  But they won’t.  Their fake morality is too ingrained.  So, my next hope is that the Klieg light of hypocrisy shines back on them.


​What Graham Platner and Democrats in Maine do is now on them.  And them alone.

 
 

Once again, we’re out and about with Jiminy Glick.  This time, his guest is Bill Maher, who we’ve posted with Jiminy previously.  But this one is pretty different.  Unlike before, they’re not on Maher’s “home field”, promoting his book on his own show.  But more in the world of Jiminy...



 
 
Illustration of a waiter carrying a covered serving dish
316854.jpg

This site is an Amazon Affiliate and gets a small commission if you click this button or any product link before shopping on Amazon.

  • Facebook
  • X

To make a comment, click on an article's title.  A comment box will be at the bottom of the page.

Author

Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, has two sort-of best-selling novels, and was a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he's had a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

Feedspot Top 100 Funny Blog award badge

Feedspot Badge of Honor

bottom of page