top of page
2111754655.jpg

The past year or so, whenever there's been a shooting directed at a target who was a MAGOP official or public advocate, the party has been very vocal about placing all their "outraged" blame on The Libs (tm) for supposedly raising the level of dangerous discourse because of their blunt, pointed language about the far-right damage being caused to the country.


There's a point to this, which I'll get to, but it requires the background foundation. And yes, calling people fascist is harsh -- but when an action is literally among the three core tenets of the fascism playbook (xenophobia, the use of violence for control, and undermining other sources of power), it's hard to know what other words to use. They aren't threats attached to the words, but are just descriptions -- blunt and pointed, yes, but accurate ones. After all, when you send unidentified masked police in to arrest legal citizens without warrants and periodically even kill innocent people just because their skin is dark or sound foreign, it's hard to think of some polite term that says "fascist" without using that word that properly defines it. When you call the press the "enemy of the people" and get comedians thrown off TV because you don't like their jokes, describing that as a tenet of fascism is being accurate. Creating distrust in opposing bases of power, like elections and calling for judges to be impeached and arresting those who make court rulings you don't like is a core tenet of fascism. And referencing that is describing reality. What else would you call Trump saying, "I want to be a dictator. But only on Day One"? Or praising dictators Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Recep Erdogan, Viktor Orban and Xi Jinping -- someone Trump admired for making himself president-for-life so much that he pondered, "Maybe we'll give that a shot one day"? And the fix for such actions, as Democrats have been promoting heavily, is not to make outraged threats of violence but push its base and Independents and anyone upset at this extreme-right world to vote. Which is why Democrats have a significant lead in the "enthusiasm gap" and MAGOPs are trying to suppress the vote. That's what happens, too, when your approval is just 32%. It should be added that Democrats are the party who have long fought for gun control. While the MAGOP not only become outraged at the concept of gun control, but the very first bill signed by Trump when he first took office in 2016 was to remove a law that blocked those will a mental illness from owning guns.


It should be added, as well, that if you don't like being called fascist, then don't support and enable actions that are -- literally -- among the core tenets of fascism. On the other hand -- well, this could be very, very long with an abundance of examples that we all know, so I'll keep it to the barest minimum -- when MAGOPs are "outraged" at The Libs (tm), they cry out in fury at "the enemy of the people," and how much Democrats supposedly hate America, and how Barack Obama is from the devil and a Muslim and not born in America and evil. "Evil" and from the "devil" are descriptions that MAGOPs love to use. That and Commies and Socialists -- and make no mistake, that isn't something new, the former-Republican Party has been doing it since Joe McCarthy in the 1950s with "the Red Scare" and the House Committee on Un-American Activities. And the Blacklist. And the thing is, I am 100% sure that if you asked those who are screaming out about Commies and Socialist to describe what they think communism and socialism actually are, most of them -- if not close to all -- would not be able to describe it.


I feel comfortable saying they wouldn't because the things they scream about "communism" and point fingers at have next to nothing to do with communism and socialism. In reality, those political philosophies are about the government controlling the means of production and distribution outlets, abolishing private ownership. (And that, it must be noted, is a whole lot closer to what Trump has actually been doing, getting the government involved in partial ownership of 32 companies.)


And to be clear, no, a "Democratic Socialist" is not a "Socialist." There's that pesky descriptive word "Democratic" in there, which can't be overlooked, as hard as MAGOPs try to ignore it. That one word -- that one important word -- notes a support of socialistic programs but on a foundation of Democratic principles. And make not mistake: the U.S. already has socialistic programs that Americans fully accept and most enthusiastically support. Social Security, Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, government subsidies, public education, public utilities, the police, the military, public transportation, and so much more. But for all the countless examples of MAGOP officials decrying Democrats and The Libs (tm) in brutal, dangerous terms of visceral rage (how can we forget in 2010 the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from Nevada Sharron Angle calling for a "Second Amendment solution"), we only need take a quick look at the current TrumpCon event in Texas.


Which is the point. Not that this stands out from the MAGOP past...but that it doesn't stand out is what these high officials in the party are still doing today.


It was very Shakespearean. "A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury." But empty, unconnected to reality, grasping at just angering the crowd. Or as the Bard put it -- "Signifying nothing."


There was Senator Ted Cruz shouting out against "evil" forces in America, and comparing New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Senate candidate James Talarico so vociferously fuming, riling up the crowd so angrily that a voice could be heard shouting out at a target of Cruz , "He should be shot!!" Another voice was heard calling the two Democratic officials "Devils!!!" And there, too, was the MAGOP House Whip Tom Emmer, enraged in fury, giving a screaming-fiery, virulent speech about the Democratic Party.


"The only thing they can agree on," he hollered, "is their disgusting hatred of America and our great president. These people are sick...There is absolutely nothing democratic about socialism. By the way, these people aren’t even socialists. They’re communists and they’re anarchists and they hate our country. And no, I am not exaggerating about the screaming and enraged with fury. Jump to any part of this speech by Mr. Emmer.




And even going up a notch higher, there was the MAGOP's House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. What he did was attempt to enrage the crowd into a hate-filled rage with his speech:


"The Democrat Party has been completely taken over by crazy communists. I call it the Bolshevik Revolution in the Democrat Party," Scalise said. And added that the Mid-Term election is a contrast between “common sense versus crazy communists”.


Or going up the ladder more to the U.S. Senate, there was Tim Scott of South Carolina, going full-throated, faux-God-fearing hate. As his own local paper, the Greenville News, reported --


"'The only way to keep dangerous, radical, weird out of the Senate is the United Republican Party,' Scott said amid some cheers from the audience at the event.


"Scott also spoke about 'dangerous' Democrats and how they 'hate what it means to be America.' He also took special aim at Texas Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talerico in a speech calling him 'terrible, all while channeling his inner faith and talking about God." But reading words doesn't do Tim Scott justice either. Here's just 50 seconds of a four-minute screed.


This is just a very, very, incredibly short primer and the angry, unhinged vitriol that we know and have heard MAGOP officials spew for years -- before even Trump came to office, but ratcheted up to unprecedented dangerous levels. And they have the unmitigated gall to try and blame The Libs (tm) at raising the fury of gun-toting crowds to violence. Have some outlier Democrats said things on occasion that were inappropriate. Absolutely. But even that -- "on occasion" and inappropriate by outliers -- is in a different universe from inciteful, hate-filled, red-hot furious, empty and completely unsupportable language that it is the foundation of the message for the MAGOP base. But then, when you don't really have a message other than hate and scaring people, and your leader has a 32% approval and dementia, which is degenerative, unfortunately that's what you tend to do.



 
 

After Jon Stewart and The Daily Show's Summer vacation off, he returned this week with a vengeance. (On Tuesday, rather than his usual Monday hosting, because of the Labor Day holiday.) He had a lot to catch up on. And it was mostly fury -- very funny fury, but very real. And directed at subject like the abuse of the sailors on the U.S.S. Lincoln, Trump starting a conflict with Canada, and the insanity of the delusional world bubble he's created around himself.



 
 

I'm not quite sure what to make of the weird MAGOP pre-Mid-Term gathering in Texas, though I feel comforted by it appearing that the MAGOP don't know either. Many MAGOP candidates and members of Congress aren't showing up. Those that are attending -- rather than staying home campaigning -- are being charged a minimum of $25,000 and up to $100,000. Trump is charging $88,000 to have a selfie taken with him. Rather than creating party unity, it's being divisive -- a MAGOP candidate for Congress in Wisconsin slammed his party's nominee for governor -- whose old seat he's trying to get elected to. It's even being creepy, like when HUD Secretary Scott Turner appeared to give a butt-slap to the female speaker who preceded him. And odd, when Democratic senator John Fetterman introduced his state's MAGOP senator by video.


Ultimately, what the convention mostly seems to be is about fundraising -- candidates meeting those who will give them money, and candidates hoping to play nice with Trump so that he will give them money. Which is why journalist Ayman Mohyeldim refers to it as TrumpCon.


There are two major hurdles for political candidates, whether attendees or not. Well, two hurdles out of many.


The first is coming to the Trump-a-paloser and hitching a ride with a party leader who has a 32% approval and being tarnished by having to campaign on issues two-thirds of the public dislikes -- not limited to starting a war he promised he'd never do and can't get out of, rising gas prices, high consumer prices, tariff taxes, calling "affordability" a hoax, pushing AI data centers, starting a battle with Canada, putting out crazy and megalomaniacal AI memes and more. Or distancing yourself from Trump and avoiding the event, but risking discord in the party by your absence. Alas, that's the challenge you create when you've made the choice to enable a fascist with dementia, which is degenerative and can only get worse.


The second is that fundraising bugaboo, trying to ingratiate yourself with Trump to get some of the $400 million war chest. (He's now saying it's a billion dollars, but then this is Trump where inflation seems not only to be his middle name, but one of the big problems he and his party are facing.) Trump has said that he's going to spend his money on candidates who show the most support for hm. And that's the huge, added problem --


On the one hand, the candidates distancing themselves from Trump and his 32% approval and staying at home campaigning and the ones in close races and most in need for the financing -- and least likely to get it from Trump. On the other hand, the candidates in attendance at the TrumpCon and sucking up to their dear leader are more likely the ones in safe Red districts and least likely to need the financing. And complicating that all the more for these hopefuls -- though in another way simplifies the matter if you're aware of reality -- is that the answer is fairly simple: Trump does not give away money, without it being dragged from him...or court-ordered. All these people thinking they're going to get "money from Trump" are living in a fool's paradise. Yes, he might give out some money, most probably to those who don't need it. And even in those districts he does give money to, he's said that he wants to spend it on ads about himself. But he's not giving away $400 million that he controls. And to think he'll give away a billion dollars is ludicrous. And worse, when candidates think you have a billion dollars (which you don't) and you don't spend a billion, it just creates a bigger wedge than your 32% is creating. Only yesterday, in fact, came the story that Trump was likely going to hold on to as much of his war chest as he can in order to save it for potential lawsuits and legal defenses he expects to face if Democrats take control of one or both houses of Congress. Welcome to the TrumpCon! And of course, to make matters worse, this overlaps on the first day of the NFL season, with a highly-promoted game between the two teams that played each other in the last Super Bowl, followed the next night with a highly-promoted game being played in Australia, all of which reportedly outraged Trump -- whose favorite team sport is football, he once tried to buy an NFL team, and he knows the sport's popularity -- when he discovered it. All of which cuts down on viewership, even of his own base.


And we haven't even got to Trump's Hail Mary Act of Desperation. While saying out of one side of his mouth that "affordability" is fake, from the other side he makes his promise to give every adult in America $5,000 -- as long as the MAGOP retain control of both the House and Senate, and recipients spend it in the U.S. (Yeah, try keeping track of that and the whole concept of the government watching over what you spend.) Putting aside that this will never happen, that Congress would have to approve it, that it would increase the deficit by a trillion dollars, that this is a bribe for votes which is illegal that Trump has already promised $5,000 from "DOGE" cuts and $2,000 from tariff refunds and $1,000 from ACA cuts -- and none of that ever happened, putting all that aside...if this was such a great idea and we actually had the money rather than a $40 trillion deficit, why wait until after the election and if MAGOPs retain full control of Congress, and not give this $5,000 bounty now??!! You could almost see the desperation dripping from every delusional grifting pore.


And that was just a tip of the iceberg that was Day 1 of the Trump-a-paloser. But hey, Trump and his crack team of organizers did so well with the 250th Fourth of July Anniversary gala in Washington, D.C. So, this only follows. So, it's cool to see them taking the show on the road into Texas. Okay, sure, it's pretty much a mess. But look at the bright side, at least there isn't a Reflecting Pool.



 
 
Illustration of a waiter carrying a covered serving dish
316854.jpg

This site is an Amazon Affiliate and gets a small commission if you click this button or any product link before shopping on Amazon.

  • Facebook
  • X

To make a comment, click on an article's title.  A comment box will be at the bottom of the page.

Author

Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting. 

Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, has two sort-of best-selling novels, and was a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and Huffington Post.  Among his other writing, he's had a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel.  As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.

Feedspot Top 100 Funny Blog award badge

Feedspot Badge of Honor

bottom of page