If you didn't see "Last Week Tonight" with John Oliver last night, his Main Story was on the Secret Service. It deals with the Service's history (which has a fascinating aspect to it), how it operates -- including in unexpected ways, its challenges, successes and hurdles, along with some failures. And in all, it's a wonderful and very interesting report...with humor mixed in, as well, of course.
top of page
Oct 5
How desperate is the Trump White House? Well, in fairness, there are a lot of answers competing for the honor of being #1, and while any of them would be a good choice, I'm going with this one --
Trump is having the Department of Justice preparing a report to show that Richard Nixon was railroaded out of office by the "Deep State."
It seems childishly clear that Trump is doing this because, as the warped thinking seems to go (though trying to understand Trump's warped thinking is an exercise in futility), if Nixon was unfairly treated and did nothing wrong, then the standard for impeaching and indicting Trump must have no merit.
By the way, understanding the warped thinking behind the reason for having an investigation to rehabilitate Richard Nixon isn't important whatever the reason. It's the end result -- Nixon's resignation in disgrace -- that shows Trump's desperation and utter foolishness.
To explain why, I could, if it please the court, go through all the history of Watergate. And all the evidence. And all the court convictions of so many of Richard Nixon's White House inner circle who went to prison, starting with his Chief of State, Attorney General, top Domestic Affairs Advisor, and White House Counsel. And the Nixon tapes he himself recorded that his own voice discussing crimes and obstructing justice. And also...
But not only is all that not necessary -- as deeply damning as it all is -- but explaining all of it gives a level of credence that there's an argument. So, instead, I'll make it simple why Trump trying to show that Richard Nixon was railroaded out of office by the "Deep State" shows how desperate he is.
As simply as possible --
On July 29-30 in 1974, a bipartisan House Judiciary Committee voted three article of impeachment against Nixon. The totals were 27–11, 28–10, and 21–17. A week later, on August 7, Republican Hugh Scott, who was the Senate Minority Leader, and Republican Barry Goldwater, one of the most conservative members of the Senate and the GOP's former presidential candidate, went to see Nixon in the White House to tell him he had almost no support in the Senate. Including by Republicans. Including, when Nixon asked him, by Goldwater. The very next day, August 8, Nixon gave an address to the nation that he would be resigning. That's why Nixon resigned.
That -- to repeat, in case it wasn't clear -- is why Richard Nixon resigned.
All those other factors had an impact in the decision, no doubt. But even with all that, Nixon could have stayed in office. Except that there had been bipartisan investigation by the House that condemned him, a bipartisan vote to advance articles of impeachment, a bipartisan lack of support in the Senate, and a high-ranking pushing by Republican leaders of Trump's own party who told him he should resign.
And all this came after the U.S. Senate held bipartisan hearings for six months, with 51 days of the questioning of witnesses broadcast live on every national television network for everyone in the riveted country to openly see. That's why Nixon resigned. With a 24% approval. It's wasn't the Deep State that did Nixon in. It was Nixon.
And suggesting anything to the contrary of this reality shows Trump total desperation. And complete foolishness. Because whatever maniacal twists they try to come up with, the reality is profound and crushing. And any new attempt at an "investigation" only ties Trump's name to the only president in U.S. history to resign. Leaving office in disgrace, with that 24% approval. Who needed getting a pardon for himself to avoid prison -- like his top aides.
And Trump is doing this days before early voting starts for the Mid-Term election! If you think you're doing great in the election, you don't do this. For that matter, if you think you're doing terribly, you don't do this! You only do this if you're flailing. Because this shows that it's the best campaign strategy that Trump -- with a treading-water-above-Nixon 32% approval -- thinks he has: "Nixon did nothing wrong, and I'm not as bad as him."
Trump has two problems with this "strategy."
First, even Nixon's own party thought he was a crook and pushed him to resign.
And second, Trump is sort of right, he's not as bad as Nixon. He is profoundly so much worse.
Over a year ago, I put together a To Do note to myself that I entered in my Outlook task manager. I didn’t want to address it at the time, since it was a lot of links, so whenever it would pop up in my To Do file, I’d just keep moving it forward. Eventually, I forgot exactly what was in it – thanks in part because I’d given it a generic and uninformative title (“Broadway musical numbers/ videos”) – which, given all the Broadway videos I post, didn't give me a sense of urgency to check it out ahead of the other I already have set to post. So, at least a year passed, maybe 18 months. I had no clue what was in it. But finally, a few weeks ago, I decided to deal with a bunch of similar “delayed” To Do notes, and I took a look what was inside.
Oh, my God! It was amazing! It was a collection almost 20 clips I’d watched and wanted to write about that were related to Broadway musicals. And not just the regular treats (and occasional treasures), but all were truly remarkable treasures. However, because there were so many and because I knew they each required a proper description, I just didn’t have time at the moment to deal with it all. So, I put it off. And, as I said, eventually forgot about what was in the note. All of these are great. But many, if not most of them are truly treasures that are captured on video.
All will be major joys of “Oh, my God” amazement to fans of musical theater. And I know that they won’t be as meaningful to everyone else. But – I think most of them (especially the best) will nonetheless be recognized as being of historic popular culture interest that most people will be interested to check out. And as for the others, with just as much historic value, I'll give the background for perspective. And I’m going to finally start posting them. So, if there’s a lot of Broadway musical material here showing up (more than usual...), that’s why.
And here’s just the first example of what I mean. It won’t be of the highest interest to everyone, but most will understand why it’s meaningful. To musical theater fans, though, this is a tremendous treasure.
It requires the backstory.
As I’ve written a long time past, I attended the second performance ever of the musical The Producers, which had its world premiere in Chicago. And my folks and I were at the second preview, before even reviews came out. So, the show was a total surprise to everyone in the audience. And as such, it was a revelation -- utterly hilarious and an incredible night in the theater, everything a surprise with nothing yet given away, and not even any expectations. Just hope that it would be wonderful. So, the show has been very special to me. (I’ve even posted some video of that Chicago production.) Jump ahead now to when Nathan Lane, the show's original star as 'Max Bialystock', left in 2002. The actor hired to replace him was Henry Goodman. His name isn’t known to most Americans, but he was one of my dad’s three favorite British stage actors from the trips he and my mother often took to London. (The other two, for those interested, were Michael Gambon and Simon Russell Beale.) Henry Goodman did Shakespeare -- winning the Olivier Award as 'Shylock' in The Merchant of Venice -- modern drama and even musicals, like Chicago (where he played lawyer ‘Billy Flynn’) and Candide (as 'Dr. Pangloss'). I was lucky enough to see him when he came to Los Angeles and was in an “experimental” play in a tiny venue at the Getty Museum, on Pacific Coast Highway.) Anyway, I was very pleased to read about Henry Goodman being in The Producers on Broadway. And floored when I read that he was let go from the show after 30 performances, without warning and before even the critics press night! It was bewildering. He’s a brilliant actor in all the things I've seen him in. From news stories I read and was able to cobble together about the firing, it seems that – not that he was bad, but – he wasn’t delivering the kind of performance the producers (the real producers…) wanted. A performance like how Nathan Lane had played the role – Max as a con man, but also a big, lovable goof of a guy, a bit put-upon by how the world has changed around him . The kind of cherubic fellow , who, on a good day, you might want to hug. And Henry Goodman played him more as a con man. Comic and lively, but a little darker, with edges -- a touch closer, he later said, to Zero Mostel in the original movie, who had somewhat of a physical aggressiveness. And so, Goodman was released from the show. It must have been mortifying.
Which brings us to this video. It’s five minutes of Henry Goodman in The Producers!!! I will admit to being wary before clicking “Play.” How bad might he be? How dark and brooding. As I started watching, my first thoughts were – he’s wonderful! This is really good. Yes, he’s not playing it like Nathan Lane. And yes, he’s a bit more edgy. But it wasn’t dark, brooding and serious at all. It was exuberant. And most of all, he was funny. And really good.
That doesn’t mean it was what the (real) producers wanted. Obviously, it wasn’t. The show had had massive success, and so they knew – understandably – what worked for them, and what they wanted. And it was ‘Max Bialystock’ like Nathan Lane. But…oh, man, what a relief to see that this was terrific performance. Even if it was “wrong” for what the producers wanted – it is not because it was a bad performance. It’s actually a highly accomplished performance. And you can hear laughs from the audience, and even big applause. In fact, I find much of it It actually compelling. just wasn’t the performance that the producers of the show wanted. But it’s very skilled.
(In a New York Times article written at the time, which I read while preparing this, they quote -- of all people today -- Goodman's friend Brian Cox who had been in the audience the night before the firing and, after praising the performance, states, "He got a standing ovation for his number in the second act [the song 'Betrayed'].")
In fairness, this is just five minutes of clips, and maybe over the course of a full show the difference between being like Nathan Lane and not being like Nathan Lane was more pronounced. Or not. But I just know, for my taste, this five-minute video was a joy – for its quality and for its relief. And above all, what a treasure for it to simply exist as evidence – and to find.
So, here are five minutes and excerpts of three songs with Henry Goodman. (“You Can Do It,” when he tries to con ‘Leo Bloom’ to join him. ‘Along Comes Bialy’ as he sets off into Little Old Lady Land to raise the money. And the tour-de-force “Betrayed,’ when ‘Max’ is in prison and recaps everything that has happened to get him there.)
By the way, playing ‘Leo Bloom,’ seen here briefly, the role is performed by Steven Weber.
As the first “pinned” User Comment states on YouTube– “I’m so glad this recording exists to redeem Henry Goodman's reputation." Indeed.
This site is an Amazon Affiliate and gets a small commission if you click this button or any product link before shopping on Amazon.
To make a comment, click on an article's title. A comment box will be at the bottom of the page.
Author
Robert J. Elisberg is a political commentator, screenwriter, novelist, tech writer and also some other things that I just tend to keep forgetting.
Elisberg is a two-time recipient of the Lucille Ball Award for comedy screenwriting. He's written for film, TV, the stage, has two sort-of best-selling novels, and was a regular columnist for the Writers Guild of America and Huffington Post. Among his other writing, he's had a long-time column on technology (which he sometimes understands), and co-wrote a book on world travel. As a lyricist, he is a member of ASCAP, and has contributed to numerous publications.
Feedspot Badge of Honor
bottom of page